Saturday, November 29, 2014
Interstellar
Christopher Nolan's Interstellar (2014) is wonderful in just about every respect and, as science fiction, a monumental achievement. The movie is a two-hour and forty minute spectacle in which the viewer's interest never lags, and that delivers one marvel after another. Science fiction is successful when it provokes thoughts, inspires awe and wonder, and depicts human beings as heroic explorers confronting vast expanses of space and time. With respect to these criteria, Interstellar, is wholly successful. Of course, certain deficiencies are also characteristic of science fiction and, even, afflict its greatest works -- for instance, Tarkovsky's Solaris and Kubrick's 2001 a Space Odyssey. (It is high praise to say that Interstellar closely resembles both of these films; indeed, Nolan's film is as gravely serious, humorless, and philosophical as its great precursors.) Interstellar's characters are dull, inadequately realized, and, mostly, mouthpieces for scientific and speculative discourse that never seems really plausible as anything that a real person might say. Matthew McConnaughy, haggard as always, gives a powerful, if monotonously single-minded performance -- it's as good as it needs to be given that the exploration of inner space, that is character development, is not the raison d'etre of film of this kind. The other actors are just serviceable, none of them really bad except, perhaps, the hapless Matt Damon, who plays a villain with motives that the movie doesn't really bother to articulate. There is a lot of lame exposition in the film and many ejaculations about "singularities" and "wormholes" that are, more or less, blatantly nonsensical. Nolan, despite the narrative complexity of his films, is not a strong director when it comes to providing clarity of action in his stories (his Batman films are unbelievably bad) -- frequently, he neglects important clues as to meaning or presents information too early for the audience to grasp it's narrative significance. The ghostly poltergeist phenomena that provides the focus of the film's first quarter hour is not visualized in a way sufficient for us to understand exactly what is happening and this turns out to be a defect since crucial plot points turn on that activity. Nolan's narrative approach to his material is frequently elliptical -- we never understand with any clarity exactly what calamity has befallen the world or why everyone has to become a farmer in what looks like Alberta, Canada. When Jessica Chastain ignites a cornfield in the movie's climactic sequence, we have no idea what motivates her. Certainly, the holocaust of the burning fields provides a visually effective counterpoint in the fugal construction of the movie's last half hour -- McConnaughy rocketing through a black hole in which space and time are warped crosscut with an immense prairie fire threatening the family home back on earth -- but I can't figure out why she lit the fire in the first place. (The images of the fire as well as the prairies of Alberta summon to mind another influence on Nolan's film, the works of Terrance Malick, in particular the blazing prairie in Days of Heaven.) But none of this really matters. The purpose of this film is to inspire awe and wonder at the majestic indifference of the universe and this the movie achieves magnificently. Hans Zimmer's score features the kind of rolling arpeggios and slowly amplified crescendos that Philip Glass orchestrated for Scorsese's Kundun and an important element of the film is the use of the music to create a rhythm emphasizing the grandeur of the action that we are shown. (Zimmer's work mimics the end of Kundun in which Glass' soundtrack rises to a thunderous repetitive roar as we see the Dalai Lama struggling to escape Tibet -- it's a fantastic effect that Zimmer replicates to create a sense of religious awe. Of course, I worry that the same musical score might create a sense of religious awe underlying images of cooking a tuna casserole or walking a poodle; there's a sense in which the spectacular soundtrack cheats a little both in Kundun and Interstellar inflecting the images with a power that they may not exactly have earned.) The plot of Interstellar is beside the point: some kind of plague has destroyed civilization and forced people to revert to farming that is becoming, more or less, unsustainable in the face of vast apocalyptic dust storms. Humanity must leave earth to survive. NASA, hiding inside mountains in Canada or Montana, has sent 12 probes through a worm-hole to distant galleries looking for habitable planets. McConnaughy and his team set forth through the wormhole to explore worlds that earthlings might colonize, planets from which promising signals have been received from the advance parties. It is a race against time since life on earth seems imminently threatened by malign climactic changes.. In this film, as in 2001 and Solaris, the immense distances of interstellar space are dramatized in terms of the time required to cross them. Relativistic effects are integral to Interstellar and the theme of the movie, in fact, is time -- the way we experience time and the fact that it can be atomized into a series of moments, a theme of profound significance apparently to Nolan, whose breakthrough film, Memento, dramatized this issue in terms of a man suffering from an inability to recall the immediate past, a hero lost in a maze of present-tense time. At the end of Interstellar, the themes of Memento are materialized in literal labyrinth of moments, an extraordinary image that I a triumph of Nolan's imagination and his design team. The movie is full of fantastic and moving sequences, many of them exploiting the sense that as humans we are trapped in the remorseless flow of time, like ants in amber. Indeed, some of these scenes are so powerful that people were openly weeping in the audience when I attended the film. There are waves on one planet as tall as Mount Everest; on another planet, the space ship knocks off pieces of floating and frozen clouds. Towering dust storms block out the sunlight on earth, a place that comes to look as desolate as the uninhabited worlds explored by the space adventurers. Nolan's trademarks from Inception are on display in even more elaborate and spectacular special effects -- a baseball hit up in a pop fly smashes through a window in a house overhanging the field, the interior of the space station is curved so that city streets are wrapped around the inside of the arch to form a sky to the playground. In the Black Hole, things elongate into bands of color and there are a million rooms each mirroring one another, a recursive brownish labyrinth expanding in all directions. On the ice-world, two men fight in their space suits and the camera shows them alone grappling in an enormous landscape -- it's like the brutal climax of Stroheim's Greed, when the two protagonists beat one another to a pulp while handcuffed together in Death Valley. This is an extraordinary movie, highly serious, an example of the pictorial sublime, and one that I highly recommend.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
An amazing film and review, your thoughts were almost identical to mine. I admit the science was over my head and I struggled to follow along with scientific and theoretical equations expressed. The storyline is such, however, the average person such as myself can still understand it and enjoy the movie.
ReplyDeleteIn response to one of your questions about why Murph set fire to the cornfield was because her brother had told her to get out of his house, she needed time to go back to the bedroom one last time. The fire provided a diversion for her brother, Murph was also attempting to force the family to move by destroying their very existence (the corn) . The climate was plagued with seemingly daily dangerous dust storms, causing the brother's young son to contract a deadly lung disease. Others were leaving the area, households packed, Beverly Hillbillies style , with their households, to venture off, somewhere, to a brighter future. One thing I noticed was early on in the film, they appeared to be serving meat at the table which would be the first thing to go in a world where crops were at a premium.
The early sequence of the ghost in the bedroom was vague, one doesn't realize at all what is going on, even when "poltergeist" is mentioned, one really sees nothing to support that notion, either. Its critical to remember every small detail in the early part of the movie which makes it the sort of film you really need to see twice, maybe even three times, which in my opinion, removes it from the "ultimate film" category.
It does move along at a dizzying pace and is wondrous to watch and experience, especially in the theater which can provide the booms, shaking and rattle of interspace travel, enough to provoke panic attacks in those who have a fear of air travel (!)
I disagree that the music was "grand" or even particularly movie, although the man in front of us was weeping at one point, there were scenes that provoked much sadness and Jessica Chastain is an extraordinary actress.
An incredible movie which must be seen, preferably more than once.