Sunday, August 29, 2021

Me Too

 Me Too (Alexsey Balabanov 2012) is a "shaggy dog story."  In my interpretation, a "shaggy dog story" is a quasi-improvised narrative, more or less picaresque, that proceeds with elaborate detail toward an ending that really isn't an ending at all.  In Balabanov's Russian film, the a group of rogues sets out to find happiness with, mostly, disastrous consequences.  The film's title derives from a repeated refrain in the dialogue:  someone says "I just want to find happiness," to which another replies "Me too."  The theme of the movie suggests an earlier silent film, quite famous in Russia, directed by the Soviet filmmaker Medvedkin, simply called Happiness, chronicling a peasant's slapstick attempts to find happiness, apparently against the backdrop of the man-made Ukrainian famine.  (I have reviewed that film elsewhere in these pages.)  In fact, Balabanov's real influence is Tarkovsky's Stalker involving a journey into an uncanny zone where wishes come true.  Stalker, of course, is one of the great masterpieces of Soviet cinema, ponderous, grave, and more or less humorless.  Balabanov's film is a slap in the face to Tarkovsky's masterpiece, a restaging of the primal quest in Stalker is farcical terms.

The movie begins with some flamboyant violence.  A gangster murders four people in a desolate, industrial wasteland near St. Petersburg.  We then see a musician, a bit like a wandering troubadour, wandering along the embankments of the Neva.  We see him enter a church, buy a 20 rouble candle, which he lights in front of an icon, repeatedly crossing himself, and reciting the Serenity Prayer well-known to us as the mantra of Alcoholic's Anonymous.  The troubadour goes to a disreputable steam bath qua tavern and cafe where he meets the gangster.  The gangster has just gone to church for confession and communion to cleanse his soul after the murders he has committed. (Throughout the film, he regales the others with hair-raising stories of murders and torture, acts of which he is proud.)  The gangster has learned that there is some kind of uncanny zone outside the city where a bell-tower translates people straight into heaven and eternal bliss -- he's learned this through a priest, of course, who is staying away from the place:  the bell-tower either sends you to heaven or you die. The gangster and the musician drive to a sanitarium where another man is being "dried-out" -- it looks like he's being subjected to some kind of shock treatments.  The gangster and musician beat up a couple of attendants and spirit-away their friend who immediately demands that they stop for a bottle of vodka.  The three men, then, go to squalid apartment building where they pick up the gangster's father and some warm clothes -- it's apparently always January around the bell tower although it's a hot day in the summer in St. Petersburg where the story takes place.  The men ride down to ground-level in what must be the smallest and most frightening elevator in film history.  Then, they set forth on their mission to visit the belltower.  Along the way, they pick up a prostitute, Lyuba (the name means "love") who is hitchhiking to escape her murderous pimp -- she's rather homely and has a philosophy degree.  By this time, everyone is pretty drunk.  They've slugged down the vodka bottle and the musician who is a member of AA has pretty decisively relapsed.  Out in the country, they encounter a checkpoint where soldiers are guarding the Zone.  The soldiers are nonchalant and let them through the perimeter where it immediately turns into a dark and grey January with heavy snow blanketing a ruined village and miles of hideous industrial wreckage.  As a joke, the misogynistic drunk from the asylum, says that women don't get to enter the bell-tower unless they are stark naked.  The prostitute strips naked and runs for miles, it seems, through the snow drifts, pausing once to cover herself with straw in a barn and wandering around in the naves of huge half-collapsed churches.  The four reprobates continue their drive and encounter a young man who we have previously seen on a TV in a tavern.  The young man was commenting as a 'talking head" on the discovery of a planet covered in water that seems to have intelligent life -- this is a reference to Tarkovsky's Solaris and establishes that film-maker's influence over the current proceedings.  The young man seems to know the future and correctly predicts which of the company will achieve bliss at the bell tower.  He's disgusted by the rogues in the car and decides to walk to the tower, disdaining their ride.  The four men reach a ruined place near the tower.  By this time, it's night and very cold but there are fires burning among scattered corpses who have died seeking the tower.  (The place is contaminated, like Chernobyl, with high-radiation, but, as the drunk says:  "Alcohol is a remedy against radiation.")  The whore shows up and the men impressed by her fortitude strip one of the corpses and give her some clothes.  Fortunately, there's a nearby liquor store and so the drunk breaks in and appropriates a couple more bottles.  The gangster asks the musician to play.  He strums his guitar and sings in a voice literally painful to the ears some kind of moronic punk-rock tune.  The musician obviously has no talent at all.  SPOILERS now follow:  if you intend to watch this movie, you may wish to stop reading here; the film is currently showing on MUBI streaming.

The gangster's father, who has not uttered a word throughout the movie, dies in the SUV.  The gangster fills duty-bound to bury the old man in the frozen soil.  The others set forth for the bell tower, a tall precariously leaning structure on the other side of windswept, frozen lake.  The prostitute, the drunk, and the musician stagger across the ice toward the bell tower.  Frozen corpses are strewn here and there on the ice.  At the bell tower, the prostitute and the musician enter.  The top of the tower jets a little steam into the air and they have apparently ascended to heaven.  The tower isn't interested in the drunk and he is left in cold and snow.  (Meanwhile, the gangster has succeeded in burying his father and, then, stretches out next to the grave where he dies.)  The drunk finds another man sitting in front of the tower.  This is Balabanov, the film's director himself.  He says that the tower has refused to elevate him to heaven even though he's a "famous film maker in the European Union of Directors."  Balabanov, playing himself, says that he once went to the famous, mystic lakes of Chelybansk where he bathed in healing mud.  He, then, drops dead.  The drunk enters the church one more time hoping for the rapture.  But nothing happens and so he goes outside to sit next to the moviemaker's body until he also falls face first into the snow.  

On reflection a pattern is apparent.  The whore had faith in Biblical proportions.  Seeking the tower, she runs for several miles naked and barefoot over the snow -- all on the basis of a maliciously cruel joke.  We see the musician lighting a candle in a church at the film's outset, genuflecting while he recites the Serenity Prayer.  God preserves and protects those with faith, not necessarily those who are deserving.  After all, the recovering alcoholic has spent the whole movie drinking and has zero talent as a musician.  The unrepentant gangster dies before ever seeing the tower.  His father, the young man says, "would be admitted but he won't make it out there."  Balabanov, who has produced this parable, isn't accepted either.  Nor is the drunk.  Seemingly, the film evidences the characteristic Christian message that salvation is by faith.  

Chelybansk Lakes is a misnomer for Chelyabinsk Lakes,  Chelyabinsk is the seventh largest city in Russia located near the Ural Mountains.  The lakes are in the foothills.  The large lake is said to by "crystal clear" -- there is a smaller nearby lake (lake Uvildy) that allegedly has curative properties.  (Balabanov describes it as a lake entirely comprised of black mud.)

Balabanov was 51 when the film was made said it was his "last movie."  And, sure enough, he died as a result of a seizure (or some say heart attack) shortly after the film was released in 2012.  Balabanov is an important first generation post-Soviet Russian film maker -- he is most notorious for his hyper-violent, sadistic, and misogynistic Cargo 200, about heroin smuggling in the caskets of Russian soldiers killed in Afghanistan, although the plot of the film is just a reprise of Faulkner's similarly violent and misogynistic Sanctuary.  I've seen one of his earlier pictures Of Freaks and Men, a movie about a Tsarist era photographer who traffics in sado-masochistic pornography.  The film was bleak, bitter, and very hard to understand.  Balabanov is said to have established the genre of the Russian gangster film with pictures like Brother and Brother 2.  He used many racist elements in his films and seems to have been nastily anti-Semitic.  Me Too is fairly funny, very well-acted, and so true to its Absurdist ambitions as to be pointless.    

Saturday, August 28, 2021

A Whiter, Whiter Day (Hvitur Hvitur Dagen)

 Hlylnur Palmeson's Whiter Whiter Day (2019) is a fierce and unsettling portrait of man losing his sanity as a result of grief and jealousy.  The picture is excellent, if disturbing, and some of the sequences in the film embed themselves in your imagination.  Reviewers suggest that the film is difficult to watch because of its pacing.  These critics have spent too much time marinating in American big budget films.  The picture always carries its film-rhetorical strategies to their logical conclusions and, sometimes, this results in sequences and images that deviate from what we expect -- this is a good thing and evidence of Palmason's integrity and courage.  A good example of the director extending an  cinematic idea to its logical conclusion is a startling sequence in the middle of the movie.  The hero, an anguished Icelandic cop named Ingimundur, is driving through white mist with his eight-year old granddaughter, Salka.  (The film is replete with scenes of cars driving, always too fast it seems, through freezing white mist.)  Ingimudur's car hits something in the road.  He stops and gets out and finds a big boulder inexplicably lying in the middle of his lane.  Ingimundur is at the end of his tether and he ferociously kicks the boulder to the side of the road and, then, hefts it off the highway.  What follows is astonishing:  from fixed vantages in the landscape, we see the boulder rolling down the steep hillside, hopping over obstacles, and plunging from cliffs.  There are about six shots that show the boulder spinning end-over-end as it traverses the steep green slopes all cloaked in mist.  Then, the boulder dives from a cliff and falls for a long time through open air.  At last, we see the boulder sinking through green water.  A final shot shows the boulder coming to a stop finally, resting on the bottom of the sea among florid green sea weed.  It's an extraordinary sequence and, of course, non-narrative.  Palmason's point is that inexplicable things happen -- as we drive over the highway, a big rock is not where it is supposed to be and nearly causes us to crash.  The hero's rage at the road-hazard is palpable and clearly transferred from his frustrated anger at the situation in which he finds himself.  And, once, he sets the rock rolling, in motion on the steep shaggy hillside, he has initiated a process that has no possible ending but the rock dropping out of control until it ends up on the bottom of the sea.  This is an unsettling symbol for the alarming processes we see in the movie.

In the opening shot, the camera tracks a vehicle speeding over slick, curving mountain roads.  After about 80 seconds, the car crashes through a guardrail and vanishes from the frame.  The air is congested with icy mist.  The now empty shot lasts another ten seconds.  Ingimundur's wife was in the car and she dies in the crash.  The film, then, uses another interesting strategy to show the passage of time.  A montage of about 20 shots follows, all filmed from the same location -- these shots show some rural structures with little, furry Icelandic horses grazing around them.  The horses come and go; sometimes there is rain; sometimes snow.  At first, we think the shots are designed to show us seasons passing but this is not the case -- quickly, we come to understand that although the shots measure duration, they don't do so according to any clear paradigm.  Time seems to sometimes slow down and speed up.  Ingimudur, we learn is one of three cops in a small village next to big fjord flanked by a huge, barren mountain.  He is planning to renovate the farm in the country -- actually it's all empty country -- so that his daughter and her somewhat feckless husband can live with Ingimundur's much-beloved grandchild in that home.  We see him tearing out walls, installing windows, working on the roof where he hits his thumb with the hammer and the camera patiently shows us a blood blister growing under this thumbnail.  Sometimes, Ingimudur has therapy session by Skype with an earnest mental health counselor.  Gradually, he comes to suspect that his deceased wife was having an affair with another man in the tiny community.  Ingimundur, like a good police officer, starts gathering evidence.  Ultimately, he concludes that his suspicions are true.  During a Skype session with the therapist, he goes berserk with rage and wrecks his office (at the police station) and the computer that he is using for his therapy.  When the other two police appear for a sort of "wellness" check, called by the therapist who seems to be in some other city, Ingimundur assaults his two colleagues, pepper sprays them in the face, and, then, sets out on his vendetta against his wife's lover.  He picks up the man, takes him out in the country, where he has dug an open grave and makes the man sit in the pit.  Ingimundur tells him that if he lies about the affair, he will shoot the man in the belly and bury him alive in the grave.  From here, things go from bad to worse.  Ingimundur's violent behavior has horrified his little granddaugher and there is a very upsetting scene where he rants at her while she struggles to hold back tears.  Ultimately, we see the old man carrying his granddaughter on foot through an endless tunnel bored through one of the mountains, a long black corridor that has a metaphorical function.  Ingimundur is on foot because a landslide has cut off car access to this endless tunnel, probably a road that dives under a fjord to reach the villages on the other side of the mountains.  In a final scene, scored to Leonard Cohen's "Memories" (an uncharacteristic song for the artist exuberantly produced by Phil Spector), the film's epigraph is materialized:  "On a white day when there is no difference between land and sky and all objects vanish, the dead will come and speak to us."  On the tune's saxophone solo, the camera moves closer and closer to Ingimundur who has a faint smile on his face and the film ends.  

The picture uses various narrative strategies that are striking and ingenious.  At one key point, the movie shows us a montage of all the characters in the film, looking straight into the camera, including the big chunk of basalt resting in the middle of the highway and an image that we don't recognize -- it's the grave dug in the meadow.  The little girl watches some sort of children's show, full of resurrected dead people, and big billowing fields of color.  The scene in the tunnel goes on and on, a hellish sequence in which voices echo off the slimy-looking black walls of the underground corridor.  Ingimundur says that "Sometimes I'm a monster" and we know this to be true when he tells Salka a gory and disgusting ghost story involving sheep liver -- the story is too intense for the child who is very sick, but Ingimundur, like the rock rolling down the mountainside, is not going to desist from the tale until he has thoroughly terrorized his daughter.  A White White Day is an excellent picture in all respects and, indeed, even very suspenseful in conventional terms and it is highly recommended.

The Chair

The Chair is a modest, satirical comedy, presented in six half-hour episodes on Netflix.  The show doesn't wear out its welcome and its entertaining.  There's nothing significant about the series, but it kept my attention and I enjoyed all episodes -- there's no filler; it's a lean production.  The show demonstrates the virtues of a well-designed script presented in a craftsmanlike manner by accomplished performers.  Curiously, the show is oddly blind about some of its own ideological shortcomings -- a minor defect that is puzzling given the program's sensibility carefully tuned to nuances of political correctness.

The series' premise is that a failing English literature department at a second tier private college appoints a Korean-American woman as its Chair.  The Chair is played by Sandra Oh and she's effective in the role.  The Chair is a striver who has made it to a position of prominence in her department by fortitude, hard-work, and getting along with others -- one has the sense that she has overlooked myriads of insults to reach her position as the tenured chair of English literature.  The Chair has a former boyfriend named Bill, who has just lost his wife and is grieving in an unseemly way.  Bill is an annoying character -- although he's supposedly a fine critic and excellent teacher, we see that he is self-centered and very childish, in fact, a sort of man-child whose antics are supposed to be cute but aren't.  Bill is teaching a class on Death and Modern Literature, but he screws up -- he accidentally shows his snarky, entitled students some nude images of his dead wife taken when she was pregnant.  Then, to compound the insult, he makes an ill-considered reference to Fascism and illustrates his point by clicking his feet together and giving a Nazi salute.  A number of the students film him with their cell-phones and post the image of the Professor's Sieg Heil as an internet meme.  This alarms the Dean who has Bill suspended and, when he makes things worse by refusing to apologize, takes aim at him, targeting him for dismissal.  Banned from campus, Bill babysits The Chair's precocious and malicious five-year-old, a little girl with a foul mouth who makes dirty jokes and terrifies everyone.  Bill, of course, gets along with the child just fine.  (The child was adopted by the Professor, who is single, and is from Oaxaca.  A subplot in the show is the little girl's role as "an ambassador for Mexican culture" at her Spanish immersion language school -- she is supposed to present to the class on the Dia de los Muertos.  This allows her to summon Bill's dead wife in a way that helps the disgraced professor make peace with his loss.)  There are several subplots that flank the main action involving the disciplinary proceedings.  An elderly female Chaucer professor takes revenge on a student who has insulted her on a Rate-your-Professors website.  She has been assigned a basement office in the Campus athletic center and demands that she be restored to an office above-ground.  An effective Black teacher not yet tenured is required to co-teach a class in Melville with an old conservative professor played by Bob Balaban.  This leads to various conflicts and misunderstandings and, ultimately, results in the woman, who is portrayed as the future hope of English literature studies, threatening to take a position offered her at Yale.  (Apparently, she turns the job down because New Haven is an awful place to live, ranked below Fargo, North Dakota, one wag observes).  The African-American teacher is supposed to present a high-profile lecture at the college -- but to gin-up enthusiasm, the school hires David Duchovny to give the lecture.  (Duchovny gets to appear in a self-deprecating role, but, of course, one that permits him to keep his sexual allure unscathed.)  There are some disturbing scenes in which Bill confronts student activists.  These scenes emphasize the self-confident Stalinist tendencies of the students; they become an intelligently braying mob.  Unwittingly, the show gives credence to Donald Trump's absolute refusal to ever apologize about anything:  the mob that wants to flay you alive isn't interested in an apology and there is nothing that you can do to ameliorate their self-righteous rage.  Indeed, the more sincere the apology, the more the mob feels vindicated in their rage.  (This dynamic was on full display in the Andrew Cuomo debacle -- the more he apologized, the more he was vilified.)  Some of the scenes involving the callow student protesters are modestly satirical and could be viewed as poking fun at these sorts of student radicals.  But the show is very politically correct and doesn't want to take sides in the culture wars.  Some parts are underwritten and it's difficult to figure out exactly how some of the subplots are resolved:  Bob Balaban, who is very good, gets almost nothing to say and his "odd couple" act with the Black lady-professor doesn't deliver the fireworks that it promises -- I couldn't exactly figure out what Balaban wrote that was left in the photocopier, a key plot point but one that I didn't understand and, similarly, I'm not sure exactly how the issues with the African-American teacher actually work out.  Oddly enough, I think another half-hour of exposition would have improved the show.  

Curiously, the film's politically correct mask drops when it comes to Korean-Americans.  These people are caricatured in grotesque ways that verge on racism, apparently, not a concern for the writers who conceived this show.  (Korean women are shown to be money-grubbing, rude, backbiting, and vulgar; Korean men are shown as loutish drunks.)  The show also relies on a plot contrivance that is pernicious.  One plot strand is resolved when someone gets a big cash settlement on the basis of being mistreated by his employer.  (Readers may recall that Kevin Spacey's character in American Beauty was paid a big settlement on the basis of a phony allegation of sexual harassment -- this rang false in American Beauty and the plot device in The Chair is equally implausible and contrived.)  Scriptwriters treat the civil justice system as a sort of lottery that can be used to deliver big chunks of money when required by a narrative.  It doesn't work that way and, of course, these fictional settlements have a way of haunting real lawyers when clients think that the system will deliver equivalent boons to them.  

Tuesday, August 24, 2021

Film Study note: The Wicker Man and Hanlontown, Iowa

 







Whether Grigsby’s residence in a small and remote Iowa town with an unusual mid-summer celebration influenced his avocation as a scholar of a film genre without honor, the so-called folk-horror movie, is a matter of conjecture.  But, even the most skeptical of observers, must concede that the question has some small merit.  Was there something about the summer festivities celebrated in Hanlontown, Iowa, Grigsby’s natal village, that developed in him a taste for the outre, the eccentric and the bizarre?


I first encountered Grigsby’s declarations on the genre of “folk-horror” when researching this note.  Consulting a horror-film website on the subject of “folk-horror”, named Witcher Words (a reference to a popular 2019 Netflix television show), I noticed a series of annotations that far surpassed the norm with respect to cogency, wit, and, even, a kind of literary flair.  To put it simply, among the dross of fan-boy postings on the site, those associated with the so-called “Wizard of Hanlontown”, the moniker under which he displayed his cogitations, were gems of lapidary irony and critical acumen.  A couple of clicks on my laptop brought me face-to-face with Quentin Grigsby, an inhabitant of rural Iowa, and, apparently, an expert on folk horror.


Mr. Grigsby affirmed that the genre of “folk horror” was initiated by three movies produced in England under the auspices of Hammer Studios, now more than a half-century in the past.  These films, central to Grigsby’s analysis were Witchfinder General (1968), The Blood on Satan’s Claw (1971), and The Wicker Man (1973).  Mr. Grigsby displayed encyclopedic knowledge of the genre citing as precedents for this trilogy, films such as Carl Dreyer’s eerie Vampyr (1932), chronicling a demented community occupying a grist-mill haunted by vampires and several anthropology documentaries, including Jean Rouch’s Le Maitres Fou (“The Mad Masters”, 1955), a cinematic essay on the strange rites of the Hauka cultists in Ghana.  From these citations, it was clear to me that Quentin Grigsby was equipped with an encyclopedic knowledge of film and a flexible, adventurous imagination.  I was gratified, therefore, when Mr. Grigsby responded to my email and commenced an electronic correspondence with me.  I am indebted to him for many of the observations set forth in his note.  


In our cyber-exchanges, we exchanged observations as to the much vexed question of the origins of folk horror.  Of course, such inquiries encompass a field virtually unlimited unless a working definition for the genre is agreed-upon.  To that end, I proposed that “folk horror” was defined as narratives in which an interloper encounters archaic and atavistic rites, usually of a grotesque or uncanny nature, persisting in some remote or isolated place.  Generally, these stories involve the interloper, the “naive eye” of an outsider, discovering sacral practices that involve threats to the protagonist or others.  In some cases, anachronistic rituals are efficacious in summoning demonic presences that influence the protagonist and affect the narrative.  In other instances, the efficacy of these religious or superstitious practices is uncertain except that the sacraments themselves may involve mutilation, injury, or even death to the victims of these rites.  In most examples, an outsider or stranger to the rituals enacted serves as the reader’s (or viewer’s) introduction to the dangers and horrors attendant upon the community’s practices.  Two examples will suffice to delimit the genre: in Ari Aster’s 2019 Midsommar, a film avowedly influenced by The Wicker Man, a married couple vacations in Sweden’s far north, interacting with a cult that promotes various kinds of perverse sexual practices, elder suicide, (Thalaikoothal in Tamil or self-inflicted senicide) and human sacrifice.  The movie proposes that the cult’s grotesque rites respond to a need in one of the characters who seems to joyously affirm her membership in the sect at the end of the picture.  Another example is The Seventh Victim, a film produced by Val Lewton during World War Two involving a sect of devil worshipers residing in Greenwich Village.  This movie, of course, spawned Rosemary’s Baby, a film with a similar premise (these devil worshipers have as their domicile the Dakota condominium on Manhattan’s upper West side), albeit with a gynecological/obstetrical aspect as well.


Literature, Mr. Grigsby, observed provides us with several precursors to this genre: my interlocutor asked if I had read Thomas Morton’s New English Canaan or Hawthorne.  Of course, I had some passing familiarity with Hawthorne’s writing but nothing beyond vague surmise about Morton.  “You should study him,” Grigsby admonished in an email: “Philip Roth says his face should be carved on Mount Rushmore.”  Morton, it seems, was an Anglican libertine from Devon who established a colony near present-day Quincy, Massachusetts.  The colony was permissive in its morality, established peaceful relations with the Indians in the area and, indeed, encouraged sexual liaisons with them.  Morton had a 80 foot tall May Pole erected in the center of his town and crowned the erection with the horns of a stag.  The colonists danced around the May Pole, celebrating rites sacred to Bacchus, Priapus, and Hymen.  Needless to say the local Puritans were outraged and William Bradford called Thomas Morton “the lord of misrule.”  John Endicott led a troop of Puritans who raided the colony, tore down its May Pole claiming it was the “calf of Horeb” and burnt the town’s granaries.  In the end, the colony failed and Morton returned to Devon to write his history entitled New English Canaan published in 1637.  All sorts of rumors circulated as to the wicked debauchery and strange rituals celebrated at Merry Mount.  Two-hundred years later, memories of the ill-fated colony inspired Hawthorne at least twice: he published in Twice-Told Tales an essay on the colony called “The May-Pole at Merry Mount” and, then, later seems to have adverted to legends about the place in his famous story “Young Goodman Brown.”  (I recalled that Young Goodman Brown, an optimistic and forward-looking youth living in a Puritan village wanders into the devil-haunted woods and encounters a sort of Black Sabbath in which all of the leading members of his town are participants together with Indians wearing masks and horns.  The scene shocks him and exposes the hypocrisy of the pious people in the colony and his life is forever marred by the experience.)  Of course, H.P. Lovecraft in many of his stories and short novels suggests the presence of pagan cults celebrating horrific rites in the tangled and whippoorwill-haunted forests of the Berkeley Hills of Massachusetts.  In several of those stories, Lovecraft imagines a “cult of Dagon”, the sea monster, worshiped in nocturnal sacraments at blood-stained altars.  This details seems a distant memory of Morton’s Merry Mount – when Endicott tore down the May Pole, he reported that he was destroying a temple consecrated to Dagon.  


Of course, Mr. Grigsby continued, this specific streak of the weird and uncanny could be traced through Arthur Machen, the Victorian writer famous for his tales of the “white people,” a race of malign fairies living among the caves and rocks of Wales and worshiped by the autochthonous folk in those isolated bluffs and valleys.  Grigsby asked if I recalled Shirley Jackson’s once well-known short story, “The Lottery”.  In that tale, the inhabitants of a village celebrate an annual ritual in which one of their townsfolk, selected by lottery, is stoned to death by the other members of the village.  Mr. Grigsby said that the story was once a staple of High School literature text-books.  “This was before those books became clogged with GLBT+ confessionals and race-baiting ethnic identity screeds, all concomitant to the ongoing White Genocide”, Mr. Grigsby wrote, a sentiment that I thought somewhat problematic.  This note is not the place to unravel the entirety of Mr. Grigsby’s theories and conjectures as to the source of “folk horror”, the origins of the genre and its various transmutations.  It suffices to say that he responded to each of my inquiries with forceful and well-researched replies and was not without certain idiosyncratic opinions some of which I found charming, although others were grim and repellant.  


Needless to say, I was intrigued by my remarkable correspondent and suggested that we meet in person.  Hanlontown, the hamlet where Quentin Grigsby lived, was only forty minutes by asphalt highway from my home and, after some negotiations as to time and date, I undertook to travel to see my informant on the subject of “folk horror.”  


Hanlontown turned out to be less than an inhabited intersection, and, indeed, once descried, had something of the character of a ruined place, a ghost town far out on the prairies whispering with the wind.  The village was not apparent from the State Highway, its prospect concealed behind a bombastic steel screen of enormous, fat-bellied grain bins.  The bins formed a sort of metal wall to the north of the town and one entered the place through a slit in that steel escarpment, passing between the towering structures linked by millwork catwalks and augers as if through a gate.  The village consisted of a single wide street angling toward a distant furrow filled with dense woods.  Two banks stood apart from one another, once competitors for business, they were now competing only in their last dash toward total desuetude.  The two crumbling heaps of brick facing each other stood next to a tavern with boarded plywood windows on its second level and a couple of Quonset huts once devoted to some kind of cottage industry but now abandoned.  Some houses of wounded appearance were scattered about the main street, half-hidden by disconsolate trees, much abused, it seemed, by strong winds and lightning blasts.  As soon as I entered onto Main Street, an elderly gent driving a silent golf cart appeared on my tail, escorting me into town.  I drove slowly past the wreckage to the place where the lane central to the hamlet, corkscrewed down a steep hill to wooded hollow wherein, I supposed, a river flowed past the place.  Indeed, a couple hundred yards away, I glimpsed some cyclopean blocks forming concrete steps down to the side of stream where a white pennant of water foamed over an ancient dam.  By this time, another golf cart, also piloted by an old man with a white beard, had made an appearance and, now, the two conveyances flanked my SUV, following me at a respectful, but attentive distance.  I turned around, passed the ruins of a creamery with a strange tin cupola shaped like an arrowhead, and, then, located Mr. Grigsby’s abode.  He occupied the lower level of what had once been a small elementary school built a hundred years ago for generations of children now slumbering in some rural cemetery at the end of a gravel road.  The sides of his domicile had sprouted several great, disfigured satellite dishes, two of them stenciled with the cryptic number “17".  The satellite dishes were like immense fungi rooted in the crumbling brick of the abandoned school.  As I approached the decaying structure, Quentin Grigsby appeared on a lathe porch appended to the building.  He saluted the honor guard of golf carts that accompanied me – now, another two joined the previous couple.  The old men saluted back to him with a military demeanor and, then, turned away to vanish into the undergrowth surrounding the dirt lanes comprising the rest of the town.


Mr. Grigsby was a nondescript fellow of uncertain age, burly with a beard that seemed to have slipped from his pinkish, moist face down below his chin to adorn his neck with tendrils of whisker.  It was a late afternoon in May that was unseasonably warm and he was wearing a tee-shirt bearing an inscription in letters that were either Sanskrit or Hebrew.  The tee-shirt wasn’t tucked into his Bermuda shorts that clung to his hips courtesy of hemp suspenders.  He was wearing sandals that exposed his feet, deformed by great claws of toe-nail.  His face wasn’t handsome and seemed to me a bit weather-beaten, but he had eyes of very pale grey that were intensely piercing, remote and, yet, also somehow engaged and engaging.  He greeted me with a strangely high-pitched fluting voice, the tones of an eunuch I thought.


Mr. Grigsby suggested that I sit with him on the swing suspended from the timber porch.  He offered me a beer which I declined.  He was holding a tall glass full of ice and containing some fiery-looking decoction.  It was very still in the village and the wind seemed to be holding its breath.


We argued about movies for a while.  I told Mr. Grigsby that the Finnish film, The White Reindeer, a picture that I had watched recently on a bootleg disc, didn’t seem to me to be “folk horror” notwithstanding the notation to that effect in Wikipedia.  Mr. Grigsby agreed and said that Wikipedia, as a whole, was indifferently sourced and unreliable.  He said that he regarded the 1952 picture involving a sexually unsatisfied wife transformed by Sami rituals into a ravening monster as a species of vampire film, on account, he said “of the blood-sucking, of course, but also the strong sexual undertones.”  I told him that I thought this was right.


To my surprise, Mr. Grigsby said that he was an admirer of Neil Labute’s 2008 version of The Wicker Man, a picture that I thought execrable.  “You’ve got to be kidding,” I said with surprise.  But Grigsby mounted an effective defense of picture noting that Ellen Burstyn was excellent in the film and that Nicolas Gage was always impressive in horror films, mentioning, of course, his recent work in The Color out of Space, an adaptation of Lovecraft’s novella.  Further, he said that no one was so egregiously miscast in Labute’s version as Britt Ekland as Willow in the 1972 version.


“What was she doing in the picture?” Quentin Grigsby asked.


“I think she’s very effective,” I said.  


Mr. Grigsby sneered.  “She’s in the picture because she happened to be in England and partying with the right people.”


Britt Eklund married Peter Sellers in 1964.  Sellers had a series of debilitating heart attacks and became, at least, partially disabled.  The two divorced in 1968 and Ms. Eklund was, then, romantically linked with the rock star, Rod Stewart – in fact, he wrote a song about her.  The Wicker Man’s director, Robin Hardy, knew both Sellers and Stewart and was close to Joan Collins as well, the person who introduced the Swedish star to the rock and roller.  


“That may be true,” I said.  “But she’s good in the part.”


“We must agree to disagree,” Mr. Grigsby said with false magnanimity.


Something was scratching at the screen door that led into Mr. Grigsby’s ruinous den.  He rose to open the door.  A yellow mongrel puppy emerged from within the shadows of the house.  The dog whimpered piteously.  


“I must care for the beast,” Mr. Grigsby said.  He excused himself, picked up the little dog, and tethered it to a chain in yard.  The puppy whimpered some more, while, paradoxically, wagging his yellow tail.


“There, there,” Mr. Grigsby said. “Be a good little beast.”


I asked Mr. Grigsby about a toilet.  Grigsby bowed slightly and said that he was inconvenienced at the moment: “my water system is a little funky,” he said.  He encouraged me to take recourse with the shrubbery and foliage screening his back yard.  “It’s one of the privileges of living in a place of this sort,” he told me.


Following his directions, I went around the side of the dilapidated school house and eased myself against an old oak towering over the building.  The lower branches of the tree were oddly adorned with the tinsel, tin-foil it seemed knotted around twigs and branches and glistening as the sun shot its rays through the oak’s green leaves.  


I returned to the porch noting that the sills to Mr. Grigsby’s windows behind the dusty glass panes were all matted with the fine filigree work of patient, busy spiders.  


“It’s an old, old town,” Mr. Grigsby expostulated, when I took my place beside him on the porch swing.  “Originally, the village was built around the river, an eighth mile or so down there.”  He pointed to the green groove in the prairie overflowing with a leaf and bower in tropical abundance.  “There was a mill on the stream, but it was archaic even when first built, not a modern roller mill but an old millstone grinding mechanism.  The railroad came through here in 1973, on a diagonal.  Hanlontown was lucky – around here villages are either on the railroad or the river.  But we have both amenities – the river in the valley and the railroad slicing through the edge of town.”


“Is there a train station?”


“Unfortunately not.  The train passes by, but there’s no side-track, for instance, to the grain bins.”


Robin Hardy, the director of The Wicker Man in it’s 1972 original form, finally made a sequel, released in 2011, The Wicker Tree.  The film is based on Hardy’s novel Cowboys for Christ and has a similar premise to its precursor made 39 years earlier.  I thought that film had been misunderstood and wrongly reviled.  Mr. Grigsby, however, seemed determined to be oppositional, expressing contrarian views on every subject that we discussed.  “The film is awful,” he said.  We debated that point for a half-hour while the beast whimpered on his tether.


Mr. Grigsby announced that he had made reservations for us to eat in a nearby town, a place called Fertile where there was a celebrated restaurant, the Mir Café.  The afternoon had become quite warm and, it was as if, the grain bins towering over the village focused the sun’s declining rays, casting a bright beam of light onto the ruined town as if from a colossal magnifying glass.


Sumer is icumen in,” Mr. Grigsby sang in a brittle high tenor.


The Middle- English song is featured at the climax of The Wicker Man.


He told me that his pickup was a bit wonky and that it would be best if I drove the three-and-a-half miles to Fertile.  


“We have quite a summer solstice festival here in this little garden spot of Iowa,” Mr. Grigsby said.  “You must come down for that festival.”


He told me that the party was held on the weekend most proximate to the summer solstice, this year the 17th of June.  I said that I would try to attend.  “You have my summons,” Mr. Grigsby said, smiling.  He unchained the beast and put it inside his screen door.  


As we walked to my SUV, Mr. Grigsby passed gas loudly.  “Excuse me,” he said.  “Bad digestion.”  Then, he cited the Middle English song: Bulloc sturteth / Bucke uerteth / Murie sing cucu – that is, “Bullock cavorts / Billy-goat farts / The cuckoo sings merrily”.


We were in Fertile ten minutes later.  The village was a mile from the State Highway, a group of twelve buildings draped around the river.  A millpond impounded a sullen-looking oculus of water that captured in its still reserve the yellow and gold twilight overhead.  An old mill with red wooden walls and a high steep gable covered in grey, worn shingles stood guard over the dam where a shimmer of water was falling like lace over the tilted slabs of a concrete apron acting as weir to the stream..  A cement overpass slipped over the river downstream from the dam and, at Mr. Grigsby’s urging, we crossed the stream, veined here with streaks of pale white foam, and parked on a little island, accessed by another short concrete span, the green dome of the islet across from the Mir Café.  Beyond the stream, some people were sitting at picnic tables overlooking the river and several citron Tiki torches had been lit to repel the night-flying mosquitos.  A string of Christmas tree lights blinked at us from an arbor above the water.  We made our way on foot up a path that led to a suspension bridge over the river, a seventy-foot span that quaked under our feet as we made our way to the opposing bank where the people were dining.  Music sounded in the air and it seemed a most pleasant, Arcadian sort of place, bucolic in the best way.  The entrance to the café was on the main street paralleling the rather crooked course of the river.  The proprietor beamed at Mr. Grigsby and greeted him: “I’m so glad to see you Q.”  A woman with dark hair and very black eyes emerged from the kitchen and said: “Thanks for coming, Q.”  Mr. Grigsby bowed slightly and a young woman, evidently the daughter of the host, ushered us through the dining room onto the terrace next to the river, bidding us sit at a small round table close to the hanging bridge that we had just crossed.  Without him ordering, the host brought us a pitcher of beer of the kind favored by Mr. Grigsby together with two frosty mugs.  On the menu, I noticed that the 17th item was named after my colleague and interlocutor – it was a hearty lamb dish named “Q’s Stew.”  The waitress arrived a moment later, asked Mr. Grigsby if he wanted his regular order (he did) and asked me my pleasure.  I wasn’t particularly hungry and so I ordered a Currywurst platter with home-fries and a cup of terrapin soup.  


When the food arrived, the owner of the café came to our table and, drawing up a chair, sat between us.


“How are things going on the celebration?” the host asked.


“Very good, thank you,” Mr. Grigsby said.


The celebration was evidently called “Sundown Days”.  On the evening of the festival, the sun played a trick of light on the town, setting at such a location against the horizon as to illumine with its dying rays the railroad track traversing the edge of the village.  In that fading radiance, the rails of the train track were gilded gold and shone with a well-nigh supernatural radiance, at least that was what I gathered from the conversation in which I was only indirectly involved.


“I just hope the sun doesn’t disappoint,” the host said.


“The sun can never disappoint,” Mr. Grigsby said with a broad solar and Mithraic grin.  


Mr. Grigsby excused himself to seek the amenities inside the café.


“Is he talking politics?” the café owner asked.  He was Levantine and spoke with a slight accent.  The sweat of his brow, expressed during his work in the kitchen, made his face seem slightly moist.  It seemed to me that he was wearing eye-shadow although this was, perhaps, an illusion fostered by the lighting.


“No, we’re discussing movies,” I said.


“Good,” the man said.  “You don’t want to get him on the subject of politics.”


“He’s an erudite fellow,” I replied.


“Yes, he knows everything about everything.”


A minor crisis in the kitchen required that our host depart.  Grigsby returned.


The food was very good and, at a nearby table, people were drinking from several iced bottles of champagne.  The sky was scarlet with sunset that shimmered in the millpond above the pale banner of falling water stretched across the dam.


Grigsby said that “folk horror” involved the customs of the pagans.  “You know that ‘pagan’ or ‘paynim’ as it used to be written just means someone who lives in the country, The word is related to pais or “country” in the sense of a rural place.  ‘Paisano’ – that is, someone who is a ‘countryman.’”


Mr. Grigsby seemed slightly inebriated.  This didn’t deter him from speaking; to the contrary, he uttered his declarations with more emphatic force.  


“Pagans were rural people who may have been practicing Christians but didn’t want to relinquish belief in the spirits living in their springs and bodies of water and concealed in their ancient groves,” he explained.


Once, Grigsby said, he had been in this little village before the Mir Café opened when no one remained except a couple of elderly widows, a hermit, and some hoot owls.  He recalled sitting on the opposite bank of the river, watching the water slide over the dam in the twilight.  A couple of men emerged from the old mill, then, bolted and shuttered so that it would not suffer the depredations of vandals.  The men must have stumbled into a place within the structure where flour had been stored because they were stark white, pale as the moon.  The men from the mill stood across the stream and looked in his direction with their bright flour-white eyes and there was not a trace of color or shadow on them.  They were like bleached cardboard cut-outs.  The figures didn’t speak and, in fact, didn’t even seem to recognize Quentin Grigsby’s presence and, then, silently, turned and vanished once more into mill.  


We were alone in the café when Mr. Grigsby told me this story.  The owner poured some Benedictine into several snifters and we sipped the syrup-sweet stuff.  Then, I drove Mr. Grigsby back into Hanlontown, noticing for the first time, the double rail at the edge of town running toward the dark rim of the world where the scarred moon was rising.  


After dropping him off, I drove back to the freeway.  A few miles north on the Interstate, a casino open 24 hours a day splashed colored light in the air.  A searchlight nudged the stars as it swept back and forth, the giant beam moving like windshield wipers in the rain.  The trucks and cars on the freeway seemed to occupy a different world than the silent main street of the hamlet where Mr. Grigsby lived.


Quentin Grigsby and I spoke several times about The Wicker Man and provided me with details as to the production.  The film was largely shot on the southwest coast of England in December 1972.  Weather was clear but cold.  The director, Robin Hardy, had several semi-trucks loaded with potted trees and flowers hauled to the locations so that images could simulate Spring – the movie’s story, after all, involves May Poles and takes place in that month.  Fans were set off-stage to blow on the actors so that their breath, condensing in the air, would not be seen.  In some cases, small heaters were placed below the players and aimed to direct warm air on their faces.  Plane shots of the rugged coast were shot in northern Scotland and over the Hebrides.  


Britt Ekland spoke with a heavy Swedish accent and her lines had to be dubbed.  She told Hardy that she had “an ass like a ski slope”, a strange description that the director couldn’t quite visualize and that seemed inconsistent with what he had seen of her derriere.  In any event, the actress refused to be filmed from behind.  Therefore, an exotic dancer from Manchester had to be imported to serve as “body double” for Ekland in the scenes in which Willow dances.  Difficulties arose in shooting those scenes and the dancer from Manchester had to remain on location for about five days.  This was distressing to her boss, the manager of the Manchester burlesque joint, and Hardy had to pay him compensation for the loss of “his best dancer” for the week she worked on the movie.  Hardy didn’t think that Ekland could act, but said she was unpretentious and generous.  (Three weeks into the film’s production, Ekland discovered that she was pregnant.) Hardy was more impressed with Ingrid Pitt (the Librarian), an East German actress, who had fled the DDR by swimming across the Elbe in a “hail of bullets.”  Pitt was a Hammer alumnus – she had worked with Christopher Lee on several of his Dracula pictures.  Diane Cilento plays Miss Rose, the schoolteacher.  She was married to Sean Connery when the picture was made.  However, she was romantically involved with Tony Schaffer and, after a decade long affair, married him in 1983.   Edward Woodward who plays Officer Neil Howie would have been familiar to British audiences.  He was the star of a long-running Tv show featuring a tough guy cop – the program was called Callan and, reputedly, the show was noteworthy for requiring the actor to show righteous rage in every episode.  Later Woodward appeared in several Bruce Beresford films, including most notably, Breaker Morant (1980).  As late as 2007, he performed in Edgar Wright’s cult film Hot Fuzz.  The figure of “Mr. Punch”, the role of the fool impersonated by the hapless copper, is a British adaptation of Punchinello, the character from commedia dell’arte.  Mr. Punch, in his British incarnation, was violent, unreliable, prone to beheading people – he was also imagined to be deformed and a hunchback; this is obvious from the mask and the costume that Officer Howie dons for the procession to the standing stones.  


Mr. Grigsby and I debated why it was that Robin Hardy was a “one-shot wonder,” an artist who created only one indelible work of art – the rest of the things that he made are flawed and forgettable.  Indeed, Hardy was so closely connected with The Wicker Man that most of his career in film is a melancholy chronicles of attempts at re-making or re-imagining the story.  (I argued that Hardy’s one success is based on Tony Schaffer’s ingenious screenplay, really a macabre version of the Agatha Christie mystery novels that both men admired – and that Schaffer adapted for the screen.   Tony Schaffer’s greatest success was with the extremely clever detective play and film, Sleuth.  Mr. Grigsby’s theories as to Hardy’s difficulties in recapturing the success of The Wicker Man in his later work were more conspiratorial in nature – Quentin thought that Hardy’s film revealed something about a secret society that led that cabal to thwart his future efforts; in Grigsby’s mind, the making of the film involved actual initiation into a secret society similar to the libertine club in Kubrick’s Eyes Wide Shut. In fact, Grigsby believes that the orgies in Eyes Wide Shut are depictions of group sex rituals in which the same coven shown in The Wicker Man indulged – after all, at the time that Eyes Wide Shut was made, Kubrick was living in England and, indeed, known to associate with Hardy.)  Hardy was the son of a British Civil Servant who had served in India.  As a young man, he was educated in Paris where he studied art.  His art degree doesn’t have seem to have had much value and, so, Hardy migrated into public relations and advertising.  It was while working in advertising that he met Tony Schaffer, the screenwriter.  Schaffer is the identical twin brother of Peter Schaffer, the famous British playwright who composed Amadeus, Equus, and The Royal Hunt of the Sun among other plays.  Anthony Schaffer had aspirations to work in theater like his much-feted brother.  He formed a partnership with Robin Hardy and they worked to produce plays.  Schaffer had read a novel named Ritual that develops some of the themes in The Wicker Man and, so, the two men devised a scenario involving the existence of a pagan cult on a remote island in the United Kingdom.  Both Hardy and Schaffer were fans of the horror films made by Hammer Studios and, so, they recruited Christopher Lee for the role of Lord Sommerisle.  (Lee had appeared in seven Hammer films as Dracula and said that he was tired in lying in coffins; he thought the role of Lord Sommerisle would give him an opportunity to play against type and establish credibility as a serious actor).


The Wicker Man was made on a low-budget.  The film’s production company, British Lion, was struggling and the movie was supposed to demonstrate the firm’s credibility in the industry.  But the picture was scarcely released, given no publicity, and played to decidedly mixed reviews – it was deemed ingenious but “too horrible” and “barbarous” to be entertaining.  In the United States, the movie was released in double-bill format, cut to 80 minutes, and shown with Nicolas Roeg’s Don’t Look Now.  Critics reviewed Don’t Look Now, an important film in the British “New Wave”, but, mostly, ignored The Wicker Man.  Nonetheless, the film developed a following and Hardy, with Schaffer, went to work on a sequel The Lair of the Loathsome Worm.  Financing fell through and the picture was never produced.


Hardy migrated to the United States where he served as a consultant to historical theme parks.  He worked in Hollywood and produced some TV commercials.  He made another movie in the eighties, The Fantasist which no one seems to have seen.  He also co-wrote an erotic thriller Forbidden Sun (1989) said to be about sexual repression in a Cretan girl’s school – the plot has something to do with labyrinths and the Minotaur.  (Even Mr. Grigsby hadn’t seen this picture, although he told me had a “lead” on a bootleg DVD said to be circulating in Macedonia.)  In between these projects, Hardy wrote a musical about Winston Churchill (Winnie) that opened (only to close a week later) in London.  Finally, Hardy raised enough money to make The Wicker Tree (2013), his sequel to the earlier movie.  He was working on crowd-funded sequel to the sequel, The Wrath of the Gods, a film that employed the mythos developed in the two earlier “wicker” pictures.  But he died in 2016 before shooting any footage on that film.


Grigsby owns all three versions of The Wicker Man known to exist – these are the 80 minute American version, a 100 minute cut on scarcely visible VHS, and the 94 minute director’s “final cut” and approved version that was released on Blu-Ray in 2013.  Footage restored to the 80 minute version is identifiable because colors are more muted and the image’s focus is less assured.  (Two sequences restored to the 94 minutes Blu-Ray are the initial sequence involving Officer Howie taking Communion and the scene in which Lord Sommerisle first appears delivering a nubile boy to the sexually voracious Willow – changes in mores have rendered that episode a bit dubious since it seems to involve sex with a minor.)  The negative for The Wicker Man has been lost.  Grigsby told me that the cans of negative film were supposedly buried for safekeeping under a scarecrow in a vacant field on the outskirts of the London suburbs.  When Hardy went back to the site to unearth the original negative from its grave, a huge landfill covered the terrain and the M4 Orbital ran right through the center of dump.  As far as Hardy could ascertain, the freeway had been built over the site where the negative had been buried for safe-keeping.  It’s a picturesque story, Mr. Grigsby told me, but there’s not the faintest possibility that it’s true –why would someone bury a fragile and perishable film negative in the ground?  Grigsby told me that his inquiries on the subject didn’t even uncover a source for these rumors.  “Internet rubbish,” Quentin Grigsby told me, “rumors based on gossip based on hearsay.”  But I have located the source of this legend – the U.K. director, Alex Cox introducing the film on his show Videodrome said that the negative had “ended up in the pylons on the M4.”  It’s not clear to me why Cox thought this was true. (Grigsby was similarly scathing about the allegation that Rod Stewart, then Britt Ekland’s boyfriend, tried to buy all existing prints of The Wicker Man so that he could destroy them – this effort said to be a futile attempt to retrieve the nude images of his lover from public commerce.)


Some critics refer to The Wicker Man as a “horror musical.”  Paul Giovanni wrote the score.  Fans of the film have memorized many lines and, of course, can sing the tunes featured in the movie.    To avoid hiring union musicians, too expensive it was thought on the film’s low budget, Hardy recruited performers from a local conservatory.  (He didn’t know that under British labor law, the students were also de facto union members, and so he ended up paying scale for them in any event.)  Some of the tunes in the film became popular in the U.K. when the soundtrack recording was released.  The opening melody, “Corn rigs”, is setting of Robert Burns’ Scottish dialect poem of the same name.  In this context, “corn” refers to oats; “rigs” are ridges about three-feet high plowed in Scottish upland fields for drainage purposes.  The poem recounts a sexual liaison among the “corn” and barley rigs – in effect, it’s about having sex in a drainage ditch.  The film contains seven folk songs, all of them much revised by Anthony Schaffer.  Most of the songs are full of extravagant double entendre.  In “Willow’s Song,” the character sings: “I saw a maid milk a bull / Every stroke a bucketful.”  In addition to “Summer is icumen in” and “Willow’s Song”, the film features the priapic “Gentle Johnny” (“I put her hand all on her thigh / And she said: ‘Do you want to try?’ / I put her hand all on her belly / And she said ‘Do you want to fuck me?’ “), “The Maypole Song”, “The Landlord’s Daughter”, and “The Tinker’s Song”. The musicians who perform on the soundtrack also appear in the film.


The wicker man effigy is based on a sentence in Julius Caesar’s Commentaries on the Gallic War.  Caesar writes: “(the Gauls) have figures of vast size, the limbs of which are formed from osiers which they fill with living men which being set afire, the men perish in the enveloping flames.”  During one of our conversations by email, Grigsby observed that his part of Iowa was laboring under a terrible drought and that there was a danger that crops would fail.  He messaged me that “if this drought could be ended by the means that you see in the film, I’m pretty sure that people would build a Wicker Man in downtown Des Moines, probably at the Pappajohn Sculpture Park, and sell corn dogs and cotton candy before the human sacrifice.  In fact, the spectacle would probably have financial support by John Deere and Monsanto.”  I asked him what he thought about “climate change.”  “Interesting question,” he replied.  “We will live to see human sacrifices to combat climate change.  Perhaps, they are already underway.”  Mr. Grigsby was apparently in a misanthropic and sour mood.  He wrote: “The problem is rooted in the human need to make sense of death.  Both the Christians and pagans in The Wicker Man believe that there is no such thing as death.  The Christians think the righteous are whisked away to judgement and, then, heaven – they live eternally in an unearthly realm.  The pagans believe that the dead simply pass into the earth and are resurrected in fruits, crops, and flowers.  Death is converted to life in this earthly realm.  This is why the corpse of a rabbit is found in the grave raised (ostensibly) over the body of the missing girl.  The hare is a symbol for resurrection through reproduction.  But both the Christians and pagans are mistaken.  They don’t understand that the earth itself is perishing – the death of men and women is nothing compared to the irreversible holocaust that will arise when the earth dies.”  I asked:  “Is it as bad as all that?”  “Worse,” Mr. Grigsby said.  From these messages, I concluded that the general drought throughout Iowa had thrown my correspondent into a black funk.  Nonetheless, he reminded me about Hanlontown’s festival.  “You must come down for ‘Sundown Days’,” he told me.  “You can pitch a tent and spend the night.  I’m sure you’ll be in no state to drive home after the festivities.”  I replied that I planned to attend.


Quentin Grigsby send me several links to articles in which Britt Ekland claimed that several of the sacrificial animals confined in the Wicker Man at the film’s climax, in fact, died during the fiery destruction of the colossal effigy.  She told a journalist that she thought a rabbit and pigeon (or, perhaps, a chicken) had been burned alive.  Robin Hardy was incensed at the allegations and told journalists that she was mistaken and that all of the animals in the effigy osiers had been retrieved well before the colossus was consumed by flame.  The exchange occurred in 2013, that is, fifty years after the movie was released.


A couple weeks ago, I drove down to Hanlontown to experience “Sundown Days.”


A pale blue banner was stretched over the road where it ran between the belligerent-looking grain bins towering over the village.  The banner represented a curve of railroad tracks running into the semi-circle of the setting sun.  


Main Street, a hundred feet beyond the huge columns of the metal bins, was blocked with some saw-horses and orange detour cones.  Vehicles were parked in the shadow of the bins, pulled up on the grass.  At intervals on the street, heaps of kindling had been stacked in teepee-shaped piles.  The road was full of people wandering between the abandoned brick buildings, little groups of men and women gathering together and, then, splitting apart.  At the end of gravel driveways, I could see more people, milling around by beer kegs planted at the edge of the tangled brush lapped up against the sides of the old farmhouses.  Lawns wild with golden-rod and purple thistle showed flashes of red and white and blue, flags dangling from splintered crumbling porches or set up on poles in shrubbery.  A whole hog, roasted to the color of wet leather, was rotating in a sheet-metal tube that looked something like an old cannon.  The air smelled of rendered fat, beer, smoke from grills twisting through the air in the corridors forming and, then, closing once more in crowd.  At the end of the broad street, where the lane ended in the gravel tracks dropping down to the river a couple football fields distant, a flat-bed trailer was parked.  A band was playing a cover of “Little Red Corvette” from atop the trailer.  Next to the stone columns and strong-box walls of one of the abandoned banks, a couple of vendors were selling cotton candy, fry-bread, and soda pop from several small wooden booths mounted on wheels chocked in the gravel.  


Mr. Grigsby was standing in the midst of a knot of men, wearing a cap tilted over his eyes that said Sundown Days.  His bare legs were very pale.  Someone was laughing loudly, but Mr. Grigsby looked very grave and solemn.  Everyone was holding 16 ounce plastic cups foaming with beer.  A row of six turquoise colored porta-potties were arrayed in a phalanx against the curved steel bastion of the grain bins, some people slipping in and out, as I stood beside Quentin. The food smelled good and so I bought a plate of pulled pork served with some soggy french fries and a small plastic saucer of sugary vinegar mixed with ketchup.  Mr. Grigsby had opened a couple of folding lawn chairs in front of his home and we sat in the shade of his trees listening to the rock band down the street.  Some motorcycles rolled through the crowd and, then, accelerated with a roar zooming out toward the edge of town.  The chain-saw roar of the cycle engines echoed off the metal storage bins.  A steady stream of people came to exchange pleasantries with Mr. Grigsby and he called them all by name, sometimes, shaking hands with the older men.


The sun dipped low and the rock band vacated the stage on the flat bed trailer.  The crowd marched down a side street to an open field next to the railroad tracks skirting the edge of the village.  Some of the people carried their lawn chairs and set them up along the alleys opening onto the railroad crossings.  The tracks ran toward the place on the horizon where the sun was about to set.  The right-of-way was level and the sleeper ties made a dark ladder, soaked with creosote, climbing up toward the red orb of the sun.  A drum and bugle corps not marching in step sauntered over the rails to the other side of the tracks.  The men in the corps were mostly from Osage and they were sponsored by a couple of American Legion posts, wearing ill-fitting uniforms and scarlet cummerbunds (the musicians were middle-aged and overweight with wobbly beer bellies) and little caps with plastic visors that made them look airplane pilots from a half-century earlier.  The train tracks were flat and straight and ran between pinkish-yellow windrows of fist-sized rock.  


The drum-and-bugle corps played “The Star Spangled Banner”.  Most of the men looked pretty drunk and one of them actually sat down on the iron rail as he blew into his cornet.  The crowd cheered and clapped hands and, behind the crowd gathered to watch the sun set, some kids lit strings of firecrackers and, over the village, a rocket burst, drizzling hissing red and blue sparks onto the roof tops.  The sun flattened against the horizon, squeezing out lateral rays of red light.  The bugle corps tried to play Sousa’s “Stars and Stripe Forever”, but the ensemble had no trombones and no piccolos either, and, so, the melody broke apart, those losing their place blowing their horns tentatively so that it seemed as if the music were coming from very close and, yet, also miles away, a strange effect as if some of the band were playing nearby and others from atop remote hilltops far out in the country.  The band director signaled that the musicians should cease playing and, so, there was silence for a moment, some catcalls and hoots, and, then, the drum and bugle corps tried again with the march, but this effort went even more badly awry so that fragments of the melody scattered in all directions and, at last, only the drums were beating out a tattoo in the gathering darkness.


Then, the sun suddenly reached out and lit the rails running by the village with golden light and the metal blazed all along its length, two radiant arrows fired out along the tracks and glistening against the twilight.  Everyone cheered and the drum and bugle corps played “The Star Spangled Banner” again and men removed their hats and clapped them over their breasts and some of the women sang along.  


The spectacle lasted for only a couple of minutes.  Then, the sun slid sideways, ducking under the horizon, and, looking up, I saw the moon coasting over a shelter-belt on the opposite horizon.  Most of the people from other small towns stumbled to their cars and drove away.  Mr. Grigsby and I went back to Main Street.  Bonfires were burning now at intervals of a couple hundred feet up and down the road between the buildings.  Dim lightbulbs glowed in the shacks selling food.  Hanlontown smelled of ash and pork fat and cordite from the fire crackers, now and then, rattling the middle of vacant lots.  The yellow puppy scuttled under Mr. Grigsby’s lawn chair, frightened by the detonations.  A group of fat men were sitting on the flat bed trailer, playing accordions and saxophone, polka music in the dark, while a dozen kids pogoed up and down in shadows under the improvised band stand.


“Calm down, Beast,” Mr. Grigsby told the whimpering puppy.


“What is his name?” I asked.


“No name,” Grigsby said.


A procession of golf carts silently rolled up to where we were sitting.  The canopies over two of the golf carts were decorated with deer antlers, pronged horns casting weird shadows on the gravel edges of the road.  The man driving the third golf cart was wearing a crown of antlers on his head.  Mr. Grigsby unchained the trembling puppy and handed it to the man wearing the antler headdress.  The golf carts, then, made a loop in the middle of the street, the caravan passing between the bonfires blazing in the night.  A crowd of people gathered between two of the fires, muttering together, most everyone now staggering drunk.  Then, the mob set off behind the golf carts to the edge of town, standing in a dense congregation along the railroad tracks.  The moon was in the middle of the sky and stars twinkled.  


The three carts bounced along the edge of the rail until they were about a hundred yards beyond the card-controlled coop fuel pumps on the edge of town.  One of the men under an antlered canopy stopped the cart, got out, and walked along the rail, now and then, stooping to deposit something on the pitchy sleepers.  


“What is he doing?”


“It’s cut-up hot dog,” Mr. Grigsby told me.


“But why?”


“You’ll see,” Mr. Grigsby said.  The man wearing the rack of horns on his head stopped the cart.  He carried the yellow puppy onto the tracks.  People shuffled back and forth nervously, brandishing flaring torches.  The man put the beast between the rails.


The little dog limped forward, following the trail of cut-up hot dogs planted on the tracks.


A dull murmur rose from the crowd.  The people were nothing more than shadows casting shadows in the flicker of the torches.  Faces were invisible, although now and then, I noticed a liquid glint of eye or the flash of bone in someone’s mouth.  


As the dog approached, tail wagging a little, I saw people stoop and pick up the fist-sized cobbles heaped along the right-of-way.  Mr. Grigsby nodded to me and I bent over and took a stone in my hand.  The rock felt smooth and heavy and was still warm with the heat of the day.  


The puppy was now about fifteen feet from the crowd, still ambling between the rails, tail raised like a question mark over his yellow back.


“This isn’t so intense,” someone said.


“Not near as intense as some years,” a woman cackled.


I dropped the rock and turned my back, hurrying away from the conclave gathered around the railroad tracks.


The puppy yelped and I could hear stones ricocheting off the tracks.


Later, Mr. Grigsby said that little places far out in the country had their own ways of doing things and that these ways were valid in their own right and should be respected.


I told him that I was going home.  “Not without a night cap,” he said.


Someone brought out bottle of peppermint schnaps.  The polka band had acquired a tuba and the big horn glistened in the flicker of the bonfires.


Much later someone said that we should go down to the river.  A young woman had pulled the banner between the grain bins down and had wrapped the pennant around her body.  Her legs and shoulders were bare.  Some of the young men ran through the dying embers of the bonfires, kicking up sparks that flared up in the sky.  


It seemed like a long way to the water, over a hill and, then, wriggling through barbed wire, and, then, down a steep slope where people lost their footing and stumbled and fell, toppling down into the water.  The river was cold and the water in its depths stirred as if with monstrous intent and the current carried people, all of whom were singing and whooping and hollering, apart from one another, dragging some downstream.  The moon painted the rippling water with silvery light and I could see naked bodies floating in the river.


Somehow, dawn glowed in the reeds.  The trees were musical with birds praising the rising sun.  I clambered out of the ooze, found my clothing spiked on a thorn bush, and, after dressing, made my melancholy way to my car parked at the edge of Hanlontown. 

100 Foot Wave

 The one-hundred foot wave is a chimera pursued by surfers in the 2021 documentary of the same name.  Probably, the wave doesn't exist, at least in any place accessible to surfers, and, if such waves occur, they may arise in conditions that can't be surfed.  From the evidence presented in Chris Smith's HBO series, 100 Foot Wave, the peak waves are probably about 75 to 80 feet high -- not exactly a hundred feet but still a spectacular and awesome spectacle, particularly with the minute figure of a surfer glissading down the green escarpment.  Smith's six-part series is replete with astonishing footage, but, more or less, vacuous.  The show would be tighter and more impressive if it were half the length.  Like many extended documentaries on Cable TV, the show expands to fill time allotted to it -- the result is that the documentary is highly repetitive.  Curiously, it is also oddly unsatisfactory as an examination of its subject.  One would expect a film of this kind to be exhaustive about the strategies and esthetics of big wave surfing.  Like any other complex art form, big wave surfing requires a tutorial -- we need to be told what surfing terms mean and need to understand the dynamics of these huge waves.  Furthermore, we need to understand the strategies involved in surfing these kinds of enormous moving waterfalls -- what are the surfers trying to accomplish as they ride these waves?  How do they seek to avoid catastrophe?  What are the parts of the wave that can be surfed?  And why?  None of these questions are answered -- the viewer is presented with a pictorial spectacle, filmed from air and land and water, drones hovering overhead, but we don't really understand what we are seeing and none of the surfing jargon used in the film is ever explicated.  We come away from six hours of documentary not knowing anything more about big wave surfing than we knew at the beginning of the film.  I presume that surfing one of these waves requires a delicate balance of athleticism, good luck, and intricate strategy -- the operation is probably as complicated as playing a string quartet, but the movie doesn't do anything to help us appreciate the technique of big wave surfing.

The movie chronicles the adventures of a good-natured but obsessive surfer named Garrett McNamara, a happy, if dim-witted, knucklehead.  McNamara is a professional surfer -- this means that he travels around the world on the money of sponsors looking for impressive waves to surf.  We don't learn until the fourth episode something that should be obvious, but isn't -- professional surfers are, in effect, performers who calculate their effects to impress the camera; as it turns out, professional surfing is a form of cinema and, if performances aren't documented, they are futile. In the last episode, one of the surfers whom we have been following as a protagonist in the series, skis down an enormous wave in a competition.  Unfortunately, several other participant have been injured and are being dragged out of the ferocious waters and, so, all eyes are on the rescue -- as a result the surfer's conquest of the mighty wave isn't documented, no one films his descent down the towering wall of water, and, so, for all practical purposes (including for the documentary) the accomplishment simply doesn't exist.  The need to document surfing feats results in extraordinary coverage -- we see surfers from every possible angle in all possible circumstances and the film is visually spectacular.  Indeed, as the movie progresses toward its anti-climactic ending -- COVID shuts down the professional surfing circuit -- the cameramen who document the surfing become more and more of a presence in the film.  

In broad terms, the series' narrative is basic:  a big wave surfer from Hawaii, Garrett McNamara stumbles onto enormous waves breaking at Nazare on the coast of Portugal.  The sea surges over a five-thousand foot deep canyon just off-shore and, then, crashes over shallows resulting in waves that are routinely 50 feet tall.  (The highest wave surfed in the movie is about 75 feet tall.)  At first, McNamara and his crew are the only surfers on the beach, a desolate-looking stretch of cliffs foaming with water, some sand, and a menacing-looking medieval fortress.  (A famous surfing film was called The Endless Summer, but the big waves at Nazare appear in the winter, usually in February.)  The enormous waves require special techniques.  Access to the waves is by "tow-surfing" -- this means that jet skis tow McNamara and his fellow surfers out to the big waves and, then, ride the surf themselves in order to rescue surfers when the inevitable occurs:  they wipe out and are crushed by the mountains of water.  As the film progresses, several injuries occur -- a woman is almost drowned, one surfer named Cotty, an Irish chap, breaks his back, and McNamara suffers a variety of serious, disabling traumas.  McNamara also begins to fear the monstrous waves. When the series begins, he's 42, an old man among surfers  and 52 at the end of movie.  Over the ten year period, Nazare becomes a famous surfing destination -- at the end of the series, during a "tow-surf" competition held at the location, thousands of spectators line the cliffs, dozens of TV cameras are trained on the raging water, and the sea is full of scores of surfers and their tow-crews on jet skis.  (Safety considerations require that the tow-ski operators be accompanied by other jet skis who can rescue them if they are overwhelmed in the flood -- it's a sort of infinite recursion, the surfers have rescuers on hand and the rescuers have rescuers and so on.  In the last episode, the big wipe-out in the competition involves two jet-ski operators who are almost drowned.)  The film is about aging, at least in part -- McNamara tries to defy age, but with less success that he hopes.  We see him brooding about having to give up surfing which is his only real passion.  At the end of the film, he returns to the water for a last hurrah, overcomes his fear, wipes out and gets "pounded" violently by the huge wave, an experience that makes him feel "at one with the wave" and that he enjoys.  There's a fair amount of New Age theosophy in the film -- surfers travel to Bali, for  instance, to consult with fitness gurus and, everyone practices a lot of yoga.  The waves are routinely described as divine, as watery deities, a formulation that doesn't seem too exotic given the awesome quality of the vast peaks of toppling water.  At the end of the film, McNamara comes to conclude that all waves are one, that a four-foot wave just as much as an eighty-foot wave is a manifestations of the godhead, and that surfing, in which the athlete lives intensely in the present moment ("neither past nor the future exist" McNamara says) is always on the 100-foot wave -- the 100-foot wave is a fantasy but one that sustains surfers and, in the end, the film seems to declare that, properly viewed, all waves are part of the 100 foot monster of god.  

There are elements of the film that are discordant.  For four episodes, the show depicts the slow evolution of technology and tow-ski techniques required to put surfers on the big waves at Nazare.  The mere fact that anyone can surf these sorts of waves is celebrated as a spectacular feat.  And, then, out of nowhere, some kid appears and uses the 70 foot waves as a playground but ski-board techniques -- he flips himself up over the wave spinning on his surfboard or somersaults over the crest of the flood.  Suddenly, it seems that merely skating down the tumbling waterfall of the wave isn't sufficient and the surfer has to do elaborate tricks as well.  The effect is that the accomplishments of the ordinary, conventional surfers are minimized.  It's seems strange to introduce an outsider into the film who's skills make the other protagonists, particularly McNamara, seem prosaic.  There's some interesting material about McNamara's childhood; his mother was a gullible fool who followed some kind of charismatic holy man and, for several years, McNamara and his big brother, wandered around the country barefoot, sleeping outdoors and eating garbage to survive.  "He did not have a normal childhood," McNamara's wife insist, an understatement to be sure.  McNamara's fight to return to surfing after some awful injuries is gruesome but somewhat inspirational.  The film has a impressive score by Philip Glass and the camerawork is, often, exceptionally beautiful. 

Sunday, August 22, 2021

Annette

Amazon is powerful and its owner, Jeff Bezos, is probably the world's wealthiest man.  It's probably a good idea to be reasonably respectful of Amazon's market share, political clout, and the movies that it releases.  Perhaps, this accounts for the generally respectful tone of reviews of the Amazon Films production, Annette (Leos Carax, 2021).  Most critics have suggested that the movie, although flawed, is a ambitious, often brilliant, and well worth watching.  These reviews are wrong.  The film is an awful debacle, completely misconceived and poorly executed, the sort of calamity that is destructive to the careers of everyone involved in the production.  I'm interesting in the works Leos Carax and have seen all of his films.  A few years ago Holy Motors, an enigmatic, if visually spectacular, movie directed by Carax was broadly thought to be the best film of the year -- I didn't agree and considered the movie too clever and obscure for its own good.  But I had to acknowledge that many of the scenes were superb and that the movie, although incoherent, was a fascinating attempt to fuse narrative cinema with the most compelling aspects of music video and advertising.  Annette, by contrast, is prosaically plot-driven and, even, conservative in its construction -- the film purports to be a bitter critique of pop culture as embodied by its three protagonists, an opera singer, an aggressive stand-up comic, and a literal enfant terrible, a toddler who sings like Madame Butterfly.  At every point in the film, the viewer can tell what is going on -- and this is the problem with the movie:  without the mystifications introduced by Carax to Holy Motors, we can see the film's subject all too clearly and it is banal, obvious, and ridiculous.  The movie is about two hours and twenty minutes and it's a long, hard slog.  By the mid-point, Carax seems to have lost interest in the project and scenes are just thrown away, shot in a perfunctory style that's indistinguishable from any other big budget Hollywood movie -- many scenes resemble the sort of garden-variety mise-en-scene that one sees in a Marvel or DC comic book movie:  bright colors, obvious editing, and broad, stereotyped acting and gestures.  This is a pity because Carax is one of the most effective film-stylists working in the cinema today.  The fundamental problem with Annette is that nothing occurs "organically" or, as a result of the character of the protagonists or their plights -- rather, the film is a series of contrivances designed to solve plot problems which became increasingly obvious as the movie advances.  Annette doesn't have a script; rather, it's just a series of episodes written in the most primitive style imaginable -- the whole thing is brainchild, I believe, of a pop  group called "Sparks" and the dialogue seems to have been written in crayon:  it's a childish scribbled mess.

The film's story involves a thuggish stand-up comedian, Henry McHenry, the "ape of God", played by Adam Driver.  Driver sulks and his saturnine good looks will impress some fans for some of the movie.  But, as the film progresses, he becomes ever more despicable, quite a feat when you consider that he starts the picture as a selfish, vicious brute.  For some reason, Carax models many of the film's early scenes involving McHenry on Scorsese's masterpiece Raging Bull.  For instance, we see McHenry dressed like a boxer, wearing the hooded warm-up jacket as he emerges through clouds of smoke into the arena of a stage to joust with hecklers in his audience.  Carax clearly expects the audience to see McHenry as a sacrificial beast, the "raging bull" who is mercilessly tormented in the boxing ring, and who destroys himself and all those around him.  But Scorsese's Jake LaMotta was good at something -- he could take a beating and stay on his feet to the amazement of those watching his bouts.  McHenry isn't good at anything at all.  Carax makes the mistake of showing us a few samples of his handiwork as a stand-up comic and it's not even arguably funny -- in fact, it's the exact opposite of funny:  McHenry goes out on stage, tells vicious stories about killing his wife or being murdered on-stage and no one really laughs -- at best, he earns some nervous titters.  Then, the heckling starts and we are on the side of the hecklers; none of the self-indulgent crap that we have heard from the so-called "comedian" is amusing or, even, entertaining in a confessional mode -- it's just egregious whining and self-pity.  

Somehow, McHenry is romantically involved with Ann Defranoux (Marion Cotillard), an opera singer -- although not a very good one.  (Carax makes his leads sing their parts and this is a disastrous choice -- Cotillard has a sweet voice, but not the lungs of an opera singer and poor Driver can't carry a tune to save his soul -- and he's not aided by the score that requires him to sing his final scene in a squeaky, impoverished falsetto.)  McHenry and Ann get married.  They have a child, Annette.  The child is portrayed by a wooden puppet, very lifelike and engaging in a cute and kitschy sort of way.  (One would be tempted to say that the puppet gives the best performance in the movie).  This is a bold measure but required by the circumstances of  production -- the infant has to sing, levitate, and enter a huge stadium carried by angelic drones to perform atop a sheer spire for the crowd at a Super-Bowl event (called the Hyper-Bowl in the film).  Even more alarming, the script calls for the infant to be ferried around on McHenry's motorcycle with neither father nor child wearing a helmet, obviously something that would not be allowed in a Hollywood production.  The fact is that the plot requires the child to be exposed to all sorts of dangers and it would be unseemly to put a real infant in such danger.  Therefore, the expedient of the nimble and expressive puppet is used to solve these problems.  Note that the puppet doesn't serve any artistic purpose and isn't required thematically -- the puppet is a contrivance required to make the plot work.  This is typical of the film -- oddities in the mise-en-scene and story are generally explicable by the requirements of the plot.  The director and his scenarists wanted certain effects and so they had to bend the picture's production to achieve these outcomes.  This is what I mean by the criticism that nothing in the film seems "organic" or a rational outgrowth of the personalities of the characters or their plight -- everything is engineered to make possible certain effects required by the movie's story.  

And Annette's story is slight and the film claustrophobic -- setting aside the puppet, Carax stages all scenes with two principals, either McHenry and Ann or McHenry and Ann's accompanist, played by no less than Simon Holberg, the tiny Jewish actor who had the role of Howard Wolowicz  in The Big Bang Theory.  Holberg is about half the size of Driver.  Driver throws him around like a rag doll in the scene in which he drowns the poor bastard -- the bestial McHenry has figured out that the accompanist was Ann's lover and, even, may be the father of Annette.  The film is so badly written that the accompanist is introduced about an hour into the proceedings with no backstory -- there are no clues planted that he was Ann's lover and, possibly, the father of the female Pinnochio (Annette).  Carax just sticks the character into the movie midway and gives him a bald recitative uttered while he's conducting an orchestra to fill in what we are supposed to know.  (I haven't remarked that the movie is an opera and that all of the dialogue is rhymed and sung, accompanied by utterly banal and repetitive music. The libretto consists of characters simply repeating quotidian phrases -- for instance, "we love each other so much" over and over again  It's like Stephen Sondheim dumbed-down to a sub-literacy.)  At first Ann and McHenry are in love.  But, then, the baby arrives and there is tension in the marriage.  McHenry fantasizes killing Ann and, finally, accomplishes her death when he takes her out on his yacht.  There's an enormous tempest and Ann with McHenry get knocked around on a sort of tilt-a-whirl ship deck in front of rear-projection images of towering waves.  Ann goes overboard and the ship sinks. (This seems a variant on the sad fate of Natalie Wood on Robert Wagner's yacht.)  McHenry and the baby escape to a barren island where the dead opera singer appears saying that she will haunt her husband through the baby.  (For some reason, Ann's either got brilliant red hair, like the puppet, or black tresses -- as a ghost, her hair is black.)  With Ann out of the movie, midstream as it were, the film deflates totally and becomes just a grim march to its grim denouement.  McHenry figures out that the accompanist, who had suddenly appeared in the movie, was Ann's lover.  So he drowns him in his elongated swimming pool at his mansion in the Santa Monica mountains.  Meanwhile the baby is revealed to be an infant diva, singing melodiously as she levitates in the air.  McHenry (with the accompanist before he's killed) take the kid on tour and exploit her to within an inch of her life.  After McHenry has murdered the accompanist in a fit of drunken rage, the baby is engaged to appear as a half-time show at the Hyper-Bowl.  The center of all the attention in the world, the baby refuses to sing and instead baldly intones a little melody with the burden that "(her) daddy kills people."  This upsets the authorities and McHenry is arrested and tried in a courtroom scenes that is like something from Gilbert and Sullivan if those collaborators were complete morons. By this point, the film has slipped into a buffoonish parody of Lars von Trier's disturbing, if equally idiotic, Dancer in the Dark.  McHenry languishes in jail.  The four-year old comes to visit him, an odd scene in which the baby sits across from her pa in the visiting room of a maximum security prison -- she's been carried into the room by an obliging guard.  Suddenly, the puppet is discarded and the little child is now acted by a real girl.  (Again, this is by necessity -- the scene requires a heartfelt exchange of dialogue that would be beyond the capacities of the wooden puppet; suddenly, Carax wants the scene to seem "realistic", an utterly futile ambition since the entire milieu of the infant visiting her dad in prison is risibly absurd.)  After some dialogue and Adam Driver's falsetto aria, the film abruptly ends.  

The genius of American musical theater, of course, is the intricate witty word-play in lyrics complimented by pleasing, sometimes, ravishing music.  The music in Annette is awful, dull and repetitive, and the lyrics are simply doggerel, inane rhymes that have neither wit nor charm.  The whole thing is a travesty that, as you might grasp from the tone of this review, isn't amusing, isn't so bad as to be good, and is just infuriating.  The best comparison is the equally loathsome but very upsetting Dancer in the Dark in which poor Bjork goes blind, gets accused of murder, and ends up being electrocuted in von Trier's fantasy about the American justice system.  The plot made no sense, but the songs were okay, and, by the end, against your better instincts, you felt some sympathy for the heroine.  In Annette, the plot makes no sense to the point of being insulting, the songs are awful without any vestige of merit, and you don't care at all about the so-called "Ape of God" -- you wish him the worst and the worst is what he gets.  I have no idea what people thought they were doing when they made this film.   

Saturday, August 21, 2021

Eadward Muybridge, Zoopraxographer

Hindsight, which is another way of saying "history", sorts erratically.  Innovators whose work came to nothing may seem eccentric to us, even grotesque, in their expenditures of vast effort and wealth to invent things that, as it turned out, no one needed.  Eadward Muybridge, the subject of Thom Andersen's 1974 documentary, is an example of this sort of retrospective evaluation.  Muybridge styled himself a "zoopraxographer" -- that is, one who recorded the motion of living things.  To accomplish this, he created systems of cameras, sometimes using as many as 24, to photograph still images of people and animals  in motion.  The cameras were set up to be triggered at intervals as the creatures moved across a background, either lime-white or an eerie black void inscribed with a pale grid-marks.  The project started as science or, at least, had the semblance of science.  Muybridge recorded his results in detailed notes, created charts as to the positioning of his camera ("side", or "front foreshortened" or "back foreshortened") and his tables show the intervals between exposures, generally about a third of a second.  The point was to see what had earlier been unseen -- that is, how birds flew or horses galloped, motion that were too swift for the eye to fully appreciate.  But Muybridge's ostensibly scientific studies (published in the 1880's) seem to have deviated into something quite different, and, even, obsessive:  what is the scientific value in exposures showing a naked 380 pound woman struggling to rise from the prone position?  Why did Muybridge pose pretty young girls, completely naked, sipping tea or crocheting?  His nude male wrestlers invoke a homosexual frisson -- at least, these images affected Francis Bacon, the great British painter, in that way and he alludes to these pictures in several of his canvases.  What was the purpose of filming the trot of a bison or elephant?  Why did he painstakingly photograph naked people with grotesque disabilities hobbling or crawling across his black and white grid -- he shows us a little girl with such curvature of the spine that she can only crawl on all fours like a cat (she grins at the camera); in one sequence of images a teenage boy who seems to have had half of his body amputated wriggles around to climb into a chair?  It seems evident, that, at some point, Muybridge's studies became obsessive and bizarre.  One wonders about the atmosphere in his Oakland studio.  How did he interact with his subjects?  What were his relations like with his assistants?  Andersen's film adverts to Thomas Eakins (and, it seems, that Muybridge did some of his work in Philadelphia where Eakins painted and taught).  Eakins was famously discharged for drawing aside the covering over a male model's genitals in the art classroom in which female students were present.  At the time Andersen made the film, Eakins was regarded as a martyr to Victorian sexual prudishness.  But we now know much more about Eakins' sexual inclinations and strange personality and the conduct that resulted in his firing from the art school seems to have been questionable, possibly some kind of sexual harassment, at least, as we define that concept today.  It's not the act that might concern onlookers, but how Eakins behaved in unveiling the model, what he said, the expression on his face, his gestures and the direction of his gaze.  Something similar, perhaps, confronts us with Muybridge's resolutely naked models, cavorting and creeping across the stage he built for them.  Mostly, it seems that Muybridge's zoopraxography was the pursuit of something completely useless -- the exact manner that a 380 pound woman rises from the floor has no scientific value, at least in Muybridge's eerie and grotesque photographs.  How are we supposed to use the grid?  What kind of measurements are we supposed to make?  There's no evidence, as far as I can determine, that any doctor involved in the treatment of disabled persons has ever made any study of Muybridge's zoopraxigraphical studies.

Curiously, Thom Andersen is, at pains, to demonstrate that Muybridge's work led nowhere and was, as Werner Herzog has said of his own work, the "conquest of the useless."  Andersen's narration tells us that moving pictures subsequently invented by Lumiere and Edison (a technology that made Muybridge's studies utterly obsolete) rely upon flexible rolls of film.  By contrast, Muybridge's zoopraxography used cumbersome photographic plates.  Motion can be inferred from the separate images but they are exceedingly difficult to assimilate into a "moving image" -- that is, it is hard to animate the separate glass plate exposures into the semblance of motion.  Muybridge attempted this with a magic lantern device and went on tour with his invention, but, probably, the results were underwhelming.  A modern motion picture camera takes 24 exposures per second.  Muybridge accomplished only three exposures per second and so most of the motion that he studied is simply not recorded.  His longest sequence consist of 24 exposures, or, at modern projection speeds, one second of footage -- his animated sequences, which had to be painstakingly redrawn and corrected, for magic lantern projection are only three or four seconds long and jerky; they don't really provide much semblance to real motion.  Andersen's narration to his film is poetic and he ends the picture with meditations as to Zeno's paradox, an ancient Greek proof that motion is impossible because space and time are infinitely divisible.  Andersen observes that we imagine cinema moves because of persistence of vision -- this was not something that Muybridge really appreciated although the concept was first discussed by Leonardo da Vinci in the renaissance.  Andersen, in modernist fashion, seems most interested in the black space between exposures, the glowing voids, the strange grid against which the figures move -- he comes to Muybridge not from cinema, but, I think, through Francis Bacon.  (The film is an artifact of its era -- Andersen begins the picture with a quote from Chairman Mao, probably a charming device in 1974,but embarrassing today.)

The film details Muybridge's life.  He came from England and took pioneering photographs of the American West, handsome vast vistas that look like black-and-white versions of Hudson Valley school paintings.  He documented the early settlement of the Bay Area.  At 41, he married a much younger woman and, when he learned that she had given birth to a child sired by her lover, he went to the camp where the man was mining and murdered him.  He apparently persecuted his wife into a cerebral hemorrhage which killed her.  Then, he put the child away in an orphanage.  Muybridge seems to have been a vicious fellow, but people like him were common on the frontier, I suppose, and a jury acquitted him on the plea of justifiable homicide.  He worked on his zoopraxography studies for about ten years, spend vast amounts of money ($30,000) and published huge tomes that are now so rare that only a few libraries own copies.  All of this bankrupted him.  He went on tour with his animations and was planning another series of studies on marine mammals and fish and, I suppose, human swimmers -- exactly how he would have rigged these shoots is unclear to me.  Perhaps, mercifully, no one was interested in investing in this project which was rendered pointless, in any event, by the invention of projectible film in the mid 1890's.  Muybridge went back to England and died there in 1904.

Andersen supposedly spent 10 years working on the film which is austere and consists  almost entirely of images taken by Muybridge with a couple of diagrams showing how the camera set-ups were devised. There's a brief excursus into cinema in which a naked man and woman approach one another and kiss.  This is supposed to demonstrate the advantages of cinema over Muybridge's complicated and cumbersome process.  Apparently, it was fantastically difficult to animate Muybridge's exposures into the jerky motion we see in the movie.  Andersen made the film to comply with requirements of his MFA.  He has since made several important documentaries, most notably a compendium of images shot in Los Angeles, LA Plays Itself.   The Muybridge film itself was, more or less, lost and had to be laboriously  reconstructed and restored.  In some ways, the movie is as archaic as Muybridge's zoopraxography -- a computer today could animate Muybridge's still shots into motion in about a half hour.  (This process took Andersen years to accomplish.)  And the whole notion of persistence of vision and projection speeds is atavistic today -- I think movies are digitally encoded and no longer projected at all.  So, in an uncanny way, the anachronism that doomed Muybridge's project is embodied in Andersen's own film.