Saturday, September 6, 2025

The Witches of Eastwick

 George Miller's The Witches of Eastwick (1987) is a lavishly produced, operatic comedy starring Jack Nicholson in a menage a quatre with three women played by Cher, Michelle Pfeiffer, and Susan Sarandon.  The actresses are not ingenues but exhibited in this picture at the very height of their mature beauty.  The camera wielded by Vilmos Szigmond loves them almost as much, or, even, more, than their devilish gentleman-caller played by Nicholson.  They are filmed with supernatural radiance infusing their tangled locks of hair, posed like pre-Raphaelite Madonnas or Tuscan angels -- sexual love, it seems, makes them shine like icons in candle-lit niches.  Although deeply erotic, the film never really sexualizes its leading ladies -- there is no nudity and they are always dressed, more or less, in a lady-like if glamorous way.  Eros, in this film, is palpable but, also, somewhat abstract, almost Platonic in its manifestation.  At times, the film veers unsteadily into horror but Miller is so accomplished that he manages to juggle the ghastly with the romantic and comical in a way that doesn't rupture the tone of bemused adoration directed at women in the cast -- they are goddesses and not to be besmirched.  (I can understand this film better having seen Miller's most recent, highly feminist-inflected, iterations of the Mad Max movies -- the heroines of The Witches of Eastwick are earlier versions of the indomitable women warriors that we find portrayed in the post-apocalyptic road warrior films.)  Although there are several scenes set in a strait-laced Protestant church in the hamlet of Eastwick, the film is fundamentally and exuberantly pagan --  the picture pits the voracious energy of the masculine Devil against the serene and complacent trinity of the three goddesses, clearly muses for both Miller and his director of photography.  

Sukie (Michelle Pfeiffer) has been deserted by her husband who has absconded leaving her with six daughters (whom miraculously all seem to be the same approximate age). Sukie works for a small-town newspaper that mostly retails local gossip.  Janey (Sarandon) is shown in the film on the first day after her divorce --she teaches music at an elementary school and is sexually harassed by the bombastic Principal.  Alexandra (Cher) is a sculptor who makes clay figures of fertility goddesses to sell in the local gift shop catering to tourists to the picturesque sea-side village, located apparently somewhere near Cape Cod.  Alex's husband has died.  At a Fourth of July picnic, the loathsome Principal makes an elaborate and boring speech.  The three women daydream and imagine the oration cut short by a violent thunderstorm -- and, no sooner thought than done.  A storm boils out of sky and sends the crowd scattering with bolts of lightning.  Later, when the women meet for drinks -- a weekly custom, it seems -- they muse that their wishes came true to bring a precipitous end to the Principal's tedious speech.  As they get drunk, the three women talk about their desire for a mysterious stranger to arrive in town, woo them, and bring sexual passion to their presently celibate lives.  Out of the storm, a long black vehicle appears, rushing through the tempest to their town.  Jack Nicholson playing a sinister figure called Daryl Van Horne is riding in the sedan driven by his servant, the uncanny giant Fidel (he looks a bit like Lurch on the old Addams Family shows.)  Van Horne buys the Lenox Mansion, said to be built on a seaside bluff where witches were executed, and fills the place with objets d'art and musical instruments -- the interior of the mansion is an elaborate, opera set with filigree, plaster bas relief and the huge blue lagoon in an enclosed natatorium.  First, Van Horne seduces Cher's character, Alex.  He is unremittingly vulgar, obscene, and lascivious.  Alex tells him that she despises him, thinks he's dressed like a fool (he lolls on a bed in pajamas like Hugh Hefner) and, even, smells bad.  But Van Horne, who describes himself as a "horny little devil", prevails on her and she becomes his lover.  He, next, consoles Janey to improve her musical skills by encouraging her to play with more passion.  Delicately, he parts her thighs to place her cello between them.  As he accompanies her, she plays with such unbridled passion that the cello and its strings ignites and burns up on the floor.  Alex and Janey, who learn that Van Horne has had sex with both of them, go to his mansion to confront him.  They find Sukie lounging around, sitting in a sort of caparisoned tent on the front lawn under the Downton Abbey-like facade of the mansion.  Van Horne summons the women to a game of doubles on his tennis court -- he uses magic to make the ball hover in the air, dart here and there, and fly into the sky where it ruptures a cloud to cause another downpour.  The women come to accept their roles in this Devil's menage -- we see them hovering in the air over the swimming pool, eating cherries out of a great floating bowl, and flying through clouds of pink balloons to the music of Puccini's Nessun dorma.  Meanwhile, another woman, Felicia, the newspaper editor's wife, (played by Veronica Cartwright) senses that deviltry is afoot in Eastwick.  She plays the part of Linda Blair in The Exorcist -- she seems entranced, possessed, spouting admonitory obscenities about the devil and his "whores".  (Characters vomit cherry pits somehow transferred to their gullet from the orgies at Lenox mansion.) The three heroines wish Felicia gone and, once again, this wish is fulfilled -- her husband, the mild-mannered newspaper editor beats her to death with a iron fire poker.  Appalled at what has happened, the three women vow to end their relationship with Van Horne.  Although Van Horne has played the part of the cynical caddish seducer, in fact, he has fallen in love with each member of the trio.  He's miserable that he has been rejected and tries to re-ignite his love affairs with them.  By now, the balance of power has shifted to the three women.  Van Horne tires to coerce them back into bed with him by various devilish tricks and, in fact, tortures Sukie, causing her extreme pain.  Alex and Janey fight back and, ultimately, make a wax voodoo doll representing Van Horne.  Sukie is cured and she joins her sisters at the Lomax mansion for the final showdown with Van Horne.  This is a noisy spectacular affair, involving all sorts of picturesque mayhem.  In the end, the Devil is defeated.  But the women are now all pregnant.  In a short coda, we see them bathing their sons, all of whom are, of course, the spawn of Satan.

The movie is very impressively shot, with fabulous locations, and wonderful action sequences -- parts of the picture are reminiscent of the Road Warrior films with Nicholson wildly crawling over the top of his sedan as its spins out-of-control down a winding seaside highway.  There is a sequence in which Janey's fifth grade band plays Mozart's Eine kleine Nachtmusik with satanic inspiration -- the kids throw aside their music and perform like demonic infant prodigies.  Nicholson is fantastic, strutting around cock-sure with banter of this sort:  "I like a little pussy after lunch".  He wines and dines his prey in an oriental-looking Saracen tent set up on the front lawn of his vast manor.  The characters are always gorging sensuously on exotic fruits, whipped cream, chocolates.  In the last 15 minutes, Nicholson gets to pull out all the stops and reverts to the character he played in The Shining seven years earlier -- he rolls his eyes, grunts, and bellows and runs around like an enraged chimpanzee:  "all I want is my family all together," he laments.  I don't know the extent to which the film adapts and follows John Updike's source novel.  Nicholson gets to howl some spectacularly misogynistic harangues:  "When God makes mistakes, we call it nature.  Woman is a mistake."   Notwithstanding the Devil's misogyny, the power in this film is decidedly female -- it is the women who summon Van Horne; he doesn't call them.  And, when they find him inconvenient and dangerous, they don't hesitate to cast him aside notwithstanding all his wiles.  In the end poor Satan is desperately enamored with three heroines -- and this makes sense, we are also.   

Thursday, September 4, 2025

The Way Back

The Australian director, Peter Weir, has not made a movie since The Way Back released in 2010.  I recall that the film was released to lukewarm reviews and failed to make any money.  It's a handsome production with strong performances but the picture is harrowing and unpleasant to watch.  Furthermore, there's a weird aspect to the script -- the movie seems to be a paean to Polish nationalism with a curious reactionary aspect.  Even the villains in the picture go out of their way to praise Polish patriots.  I assume this strange feature originates in the book on which the picture is based Slawomir Rawicz' The Long Walk (1956).  Peter Weir has been an acclaimed filmmaker -- he made The Year of Living Dangerously (with a young Mel Gibson), Picnic at Hanging Rock, Gallipoli, Witness (with Harrison Ford), The Truman Show, and a film version of Master and Commander (based on the Patrick O'Brien historical novel); his pictures have been intelligent fusions of thought-provoking and challenging narratives with star power and popular appeal.  Weir's instincts seem to have deserted him in The Way Back -- there's something impalpably wrong with the movie; it may be that the subject matter is too grim to be entertaining.  

During World War Two, a resistance fighter for the Polish underground is captured by Stalin's thugs.  The man is asked to sign a confession but refuses.  Then, the commissar confronts our protagonist with his wife who has been tortured into informing on him.  The resistance fighter, Janusz, is sent to a labor camp in Siberia, a hundred or so miles north of Lake Baikal.  The labor camp is a hellhole in which the prisoners are beaten, forced to work in subzero temperatures cutting down trees and breaking rocks, and systematically starved.  The Gulag is run from the inside by a group of malign career criminals led by Valka (Colin Ferrell) who plays a homicidal gangster -- he knifes a man to death in order to take his sweater which he, then, gambles away.  The work detail gets caught in a blizzard and a number of the weakened prisoners freeze to death.  Janusz, who is skilled in outdoor survival, saves the company by retreating into a forest (notwithstanding threats by the panicked guards to shoot him) and constructing a wind break.  In retaliation for his resourcefulness, he and his comrades are sent to a mine, visualized as a chaos of explosions, falling rock, and steamy shadowy darkness.  In the mine, Janusz hallucinates the door to a dacha with flowers on the sill that he staggers toward but can't reach.  The situation becomes increasingly dire and, so, Janusz with six other inmates plot their escape and flee from the camp in the snowy darkness -- the blizzard will cover their tracks.  After a desperate chase -- they are pursued by dogs -- the convicts elude the guards but, then, are trapped in the Siberian wilderness.  (Like Trump's "Alligator Alcatraz", geography not walls and guards are the main security measures confining the prisoners to the Gulag camp.)   One of the men has night blindness, wanders off while gathering firewood, and freezes to death.  The men become increasingly weak -- we see them eating bugs and contemplating cannibalism -- but, at last, reach Lake Baikal where there are remote and scattered villages from which they can steal food. Upon reaching the border with Mongolia, the fierce convict, Valka, refuses to leave Mother Russia -- he is a Russian patriot and, in fact, an admirer of Lenin and Stalin.  The escapees have picked up a wan, wraith-like Polish girl wandering in the woods near the great lake -- it's never entirely clear why she is alone in the wilderness and, as it happens, she is also a liar so her explanations must be discounted.  Because Mongolia is also a Communist country (and this film is avowedly anti-Communist), the characters continue to avoid villages and roads, walking cross country until they reach the Gobi desert.  They, then, stagger across the desert for hundreds of miles gradually perishing from thirst and inanition.  The Polish girl dies and others perish as well.  Only four survivors reach Tibet where they are met by some monks who assist them, demanding that they wait for Spring to limp over the Himalayas.  But our heroes are anxious to get back and, so, they hike across the Himalayas in mid-winter, ending up in the terraces where tea is grown in Bhutan.  This is effectively the end of the trek and the film doesn't really explain what happens next.  There's a montage involving the vexed history of countries behind the Iron Curtain progressing from the end of the Second World War through the Fall of Communism.  In the final scene, Vulka, who is now, an old man sees the dacha that he has envisioned for the last forty years, finds a key under a peculiar honeycomb-shaped rock and, then, enters the cottage where he is reunited with his aged wife.  

All of this is filmed with great conviction.  The protagonists starve, are frozen half to death, fall into water and run across fracturing ice; they are swarmed by mosquitos until their eyes are swollen shut and, then, crawl across an infinity of bright, hideous desert -- they drink mud and eat insects and fight with wolves for fragments of a rotting bloody carcass.  Their feet are scabbed, swollen, blistered and the sun burns their faces.  It's mostly horrific and utterly without drama -- it's almost impossible to make a movie about a hike of this sort:  what are you going to show?  people walking doggedly through all sorts of landscapes -- they just walk and walk and walk, quarreling sometimes, and, then, collapsing and dying.  Movies about people perishing of thirst in the desert don't have much appeal.  It's the same problem with the Titanic -- do I really want to see a bunch of people drowning in frigid water?  Parts of the movie are gripping and the landscapes are spectacular, huge vistas with tiny figures limping over the peaks or glaciers or sand dunes.  But the movie seems somewhat pointless.  Ed Harris plays an American prisoner haunted by grief; he is anguished over bringing his family to Russia where he was employed as some kind of engineer and, therefore, blames himself for his son being shot by the Communists.  The film's entire orientation is aggressively pro-Polish and anti-Communist.  A good comparison to this film is Werner Herzog's Rescue Dawn about American POWs escaping through the wilderness from a hellish prison camp in the jungle -- somehow, Herzog makes a picture that is febrile, a visionary nightmare from which the viewer feels distanced due to the movie's beauty and feverish alienating intensity -- he aestheticizes starvation and misery.  Weir, who was also one of cinema's notable visionaries (I am thinking of The Last Wave and Picnic at Hanging Rock) can't quite figure out how to make walking interesting -- it's like The Lord of the Rings without the monster spiders, horror-horsemen, and orcs.  I wanted to like this picture because it's an honorable effort, but I can't recommend it.  

(The book on which the movie is based has recently been revealed to be a hoax.  There's no evidence that the protagonist and author actually completed the titular Long Walk  and there are, indeed, certain implausibilities in the story.  Knowledge that this grim trek never really happened is both reassuring but fatal to the movie, which seems completely pointless in the absence of a documentary basis in fact)_